These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30158081)

  • 1. Cost Implications of Oral Contrast Administration in the Emergency Department: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis.
    Shankar PR; Parikh KR; Heilbrun ME; Sweeney BM; Flake AN; Herbstman EA; Hoffman TJ; Havey R; Kronick S; Davenport MS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jan; 16(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 30158081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT for Acute Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain-Is Oral Contrast Really Required?
    Kessner R; Barnes S; Halpern P; Makrin V; Blachar A
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):840-845. PubMed ID: 28237189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergency department experience with nonoral contrast computed tomography in the evaluation of patients for appendicitis.
    Glauser J; Siff J; Emerman C
    J Patient Saf; 2014 Sep; 10(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 24080721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of CT oral contrast administration in the emergency department of a quaternary oncology hospital: diagnostic implications, turnaround times, and assessment of ED physician ordering.
    Jensen CT; Blair KJ; Le O; Sun J; Wei W; Korivi BR; Morani AC; Wagner-Bartak NA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Nov; 42(11):2760-2768. PubMed ID: 28523416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Fixed-Volume and Weight-Based Dosing Regimens on the Cost and Volume of Administered Iodinated Contrast Material at Abdominal CT.
    Davenport MS; Parikh KR; Mayo-Smith WW; Israel GM; Brown RK; Ellis JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Mar; 14(3):359-370. PubMed ID: 28017270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Setting Using Computed Tomography Without Oral Contrast in Patients With Body Mass Index Greater Than 25.
    Uyeda JW; Yu H; Ramalingam V; Devalapalli AP; Soto JA; Anderson SW
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 26248155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Financial Implications of Revised ACR Guidelines for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Testing Before Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
    Shankar PR; Parikh K; Davenport MS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Feb; 15(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 29279295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast.
    Huynh LN; Coughlin BF; Wolfe J; Blank F; Lee SY; Smithline HA
    Emerg Radiol; 2004 Jul; 10(6):310-3. PubMed ID: 15278712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a decision-analytic model to support the use of a new oral US contrast agent in patients with abdominal pain.
    Bree RL; Arnold RJ; Pettit KG; Kaniecki DJ; O'haeri C; LaFrance ND; Toaff AL
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 11249087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of body mass index on concordance in the interpretation of matched noncontrast and contrast abdominal pelvic computed tomographic scans in ED patients with nontraumatic abdominal pain.
    Wolfe JM; Smithline H; Lee S; Coughlin B; Polino J; Blank F
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Mar; 24(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 16490641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissecting Costs of CT Study: Application of TDABC (Time-driven Activity-based Costing) in a Tertiary Academic Center.
    Anzai Y; Heilbrun ME; Haas D; Boi L; Moshre K; Minoshima S; Kaplan R; Lee VS
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 27988200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-driven activity-based costing to identify opportunities for cost reduction in pediatric appendectomy.
    Yu YR; Abbas PI; Smith CM; Carberry KE; Ren H; Patel B; Nuchtern JG; Lopez ME
    J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Dec; 51(12):1962-1966. PubMed ID: 27697316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elimination of oral contrast leads to faster scans in the workup of abdominal pain in the emergency setting without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
    Jun JK; Winata LS; Morrissey B; Sutherland T
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Aug; 64(4):496-498. PubMed ID: 32506797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of oral phenytoin, intravenous phenytoin, and intravenous fosphenytoin in the emergency department.
    Rudis MI; Touchette DR; Swadron SP; Chiu AP; Orlinsky M
    Ann Emerg Med; 2004 Mar; 43(3):386-97. PubMed ID: 14985668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of Noncontrast Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis for Evaluating Nontraumatic Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department.
    Payor A; Jois P; Wilson J; Kedar R; Nallamshetty L; Grubb S; Sullivan C; Fowler T
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 49(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 26306680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of introducing a no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) pathway on radiology turn around times, emergency department length of stay, and patient safety.
    Razavi SA; Johnson JO; Kassin MT; Applegate KE
    Emerg Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):605-13. PubMed ID: 24902657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A plea for oral contrast administration in CT for emergency department patients.
    Winter T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):W90. PubMed ID: 20566789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation.
    Sheedy SP; Earnest F; Fletcher JG; Fidler JL; Hoskin TL
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):729-36. PubMed ID: 17114622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only.
    Anderson SW; Soto JA; Lucey BC; Ozonoff A; Jordan JD; Ratevosian J; Ulrich AS; Rathlev NK; Mitchell PM; Rebholz C; Feldman JA; Rhea JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 19843742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive oral contrast material for CT evaluation of non-traumatic abdominal pain in the ED: prospective assessment of diagnostic confidence and throughput metrics.
    Triche BL; Annamalai A; Pooler BD; Glazer JM; Zadra JD; Barclay-Buchanan CJ; Hekman DJ; Mao L; Pickhardt PJ; Lubner MG
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2956-2967. PubMed ID: 35739367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.