These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30159319)
21. Using a web-based application to define the accuracy of diagnostic tests when the gold standard is imperfect. Lim C; Wannapinij P; White L; Day NP; Cooper BS; Peacock SJ; Limmathurotsakul D PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79489. PubMed ID: 24265775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening without a "gold standard": the Hui-Walter paradigm revisited. Johnson WO; Gastwirth JL; Pearson LM Am J Epidemiol; 2001 May; 153(9):921-4. PubMed ID: 11323324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children. Marais BJ; Gie RP; Hesseling AC; Schaaf HS; Lombard C; Enarson DA; Beyers N Pediatrics; 2006 Nov; 118(5):e1350-9. PubMed ID: 17079536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives. Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimation of the individual slaughterhouse surveillance sensitivity for bovine tuberculosis in Catalonia (North-Eastern Spain). Garcia-Saenz A; Napp S; Lopez S; Casal J; Allepuz A Prev Vet Med; 2015 Oct; 121(3-4):332-7. PubMed ID: 26302853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Test characteristics of the tuberculin skin test and post-mortem examination for bovine tuberculosis diagnosis in cattle in Northern Ireland estimated by Bayesian latent class analysis with adjustments for covariates. O'Hagan MJH; Ni H; Menzies FD; Pascual-Linaza AV; Georgaki A; Stegeman JA Epidemiol Infect; 2019 Jan; 147():e209. PubMed ID: 31364540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination against Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in dairy cattle, given its cross-reactivity with tuberculosis tests. Groenendaal H; Zagmutt FJ; Patton EA; Wells SJ J Dairy Sci; 2015 Sep; 98(9):6070-84. PubMed ID: 26117348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Taking Costs and Diagnostic Test Accuracy into Account When Designing Prevalence Studies: An Application to Childhood Tuberculosis Prevalence. Wang Z; Dendukuri N; Pai M; Joseph L Med Decis Making; 2017 Nov; 37(8):922-929. PubMed ID: 28627302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Methods of investigation in clinical cardiology. X. Studies on the evaluation of diagnostic tests in cardiology]. Cabello López JB; Pozo Rodríguez P Rev Esp Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):507-19. PubMed ID: 9304178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard using an Anaplasma marginale field data set]. Müllner P; Dreher UM; Meli ML; Lutz H; Hofman-Lehmann R; Doherr MG Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005; 118(9-10):416-22. PubMed ID: 16206931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-effectiveness assessment of three components of the bovine tuberculosis surveillance system by intradermal tuberculin testing in French cattle farms by a scenario tree approach. Poirier V; Rivière J; Bouveret A; Gardon S; Dufour B Prev Vet Med; 2019 May; 166():93-109. PubMed ID: 30935511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies. Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Defined Antigen Skin Test That Enables Implementation of BCG Vaccination for Control of Bovine Tuberculosis: Proof of Concept. Srinivasan S; Subramanian S; Shankar Balakrishnan S; Ramaiyan Selvaraju K; Manomohan V; Selladurai S; Jothivelu M; Kandasamy S; Gopal DR; Kathaperumal K; Conlan AJK; Veerasami M; Bakker D; Vordermeier M; Kapur V Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():391. PubMed ID: 32793643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols. Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incorporating the sampling variation of the disease prevalence when calculating the sample size in a study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a test. Yi Q; Panzarella T; Corey P Control Clin Trials; 2004 Aug; 25(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 15296816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard. Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random. Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20552570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic test validation studies when there is a perfect reference standard. Heuer C; Stevenson MA Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):261-270. PubMed ID: 34140725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]