BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30159620)

  • 1. A randomized controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in population-based screening in Bergen: interim analysis of performance indicators from the To-Be trial.
    Aase HS; Holen ÅS; Pedersen K; Houssami N; Haldorsen IS; Sebuødegård S; Hanestad B; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1175-1186. PubMed ID: 30159620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.
    Moshina N; Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Haldorsen IS; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32930649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
    Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost differences between digital tomosynthesis and standard digital mammography in a breast cancer screening programme: results from the To-Be trial in Norway.
    Moger TA; Swanson JO; Holen ÅS; Hanestad B; Hofvind S
    Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Nov; 20(8):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 31399773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
    Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.
    Hofvind S; Moshina N; Holen ÅS; Danielsen AS; Lee CI; Houssami N; Aase HS; Akslen LA; Haldorsen IS
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 33973840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
    Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
    Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
    Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic features and screening outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.
    Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Hoff SR; Holen ÅS; Haldorsen IS; Hovda T; Hanestad B; Sandvik CK; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109753. PubMed ID: 34053786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
    Mall S; Noakes J; Kossoff M; Lee W; McKessar M; Goy A; Duncombe J; Roberts M; Giuffre B; Miller A; Bhola N; Kapoor C; Shearman C; DaCosta G; Choi S; Sterba J; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Donohue K; Macdonell-Scott B; Klijnsma F; Suzuki K; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5182-5194. PubMed ID: 29846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Following Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Findings From a Learning Health System.
    Alsheik NH; Dabbous F; Pohlman SK; Troeger KM; Gliklich RE; Donadio GM; Su Z; Menon V; Conant EF
    Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 30057195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.