BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30159620)

  • 21. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
    Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis.
    Weigel S; Heindel W; Hense HW; Decker T; Gerß J; Kerschke L;
    Radiology; 2023 Feb; 306(2):e221006. PubMed ID: 36194110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening and diagnosis in women with dense breasts - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Phi XA; Tagliafico A; Houssami N; Greuter MJW; de Bock GH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):380. PubMed ID: 29615072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA Subanalysis.
    Weigel S; Heindel W; Decker T; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Gerß J; Hense HW;
    Radiology; 2023 Dec; 309(3):e231533. PubMed ID: 38051184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
    Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast cancer screening in women with and without implants: retrospective study comparing digital mammography to digital mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Perry RE; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Lesslie MD; Gerlach KE; Sun J; Srinivasan A; Leung JWT
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9499-9510. PubMed ID: 34014380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway.
    Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lång K; Albertsen JL; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Sahlberg KK; Skaane P; Suhrke P; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31821118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
    Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tomosynthesis with synthesised two-dimensional mammography yields higher cancer detection compared to digital mammography alone, also in dense breasts and in younger women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Jänsch A; Hacker A; Weinand S; Vogelmann T
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 152():110324. PubMed ID: 35576720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A prospective study comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with digital mammography in surveillance after breast cancer treatment.
    Sia J; Moodie K; Bressel M; Lau E; Gyorki D; Skandarajah A; Chua B
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jul; 61():122-7. PubMed ID: 27163158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammographic Screening in Routine Practice: Multisite Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screenings.
    Conant EF; Talley MM; Parghi CR; Sheh BC; Liang SY; Pohlman S; Rane A; Jung Y; Stevens LAS; Paulus JK; Alsheik N
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(3):e221571. PubMed ID: 36916891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
    Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An individual participant data meta-analysis of breast cancer detection and recall rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography population screening.
    Libesman S; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S; Seidler AL; Bernardi D; Lång K; Robledo KP; Houssami N
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(5):e647-e654. PubMed ID: 35246389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effectiveness of hybrid digital breast tomosynthesis/digital mammography compared to digital mammography in women presenting for routine screening at Maroondah BreastScreen: Study protocol for a co-designed, non-randomised prospective trial.
    Houssami N; Lockie D; Giles M; Doncovio S; Marr G; Taylor D; Li T; Nickel B; Marinovich ML
    Breast; 2024 Apr; 74():103692. PubMed ID: 38422623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation.
    Bernardi D; Gentilini MA; De Nisi M; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Luparia A; Houssami N
    Breast; 2020 Apr; 50():135-140. PubMed ID: 31607526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial.
    Olinder J; Johnson K; Åkesson A; Förnvik D; Zackrisson S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Oct; 25(1):116. PubMed ID: 37794480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts.
    Ha SM; Yi A; Yim D; Jang MJ; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Lee EJ; Lee SH; Moon WK; Chang JM
    Korean J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):274-283. PubMed ID: 36996902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.