These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30159620)

  • 41. Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial.
    Olinder J; Johnson K; Åkesson A; Förnvik D; Zackrisson S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Oct; 25(1):116. PubMed ID: 37794480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts.
    Ha SM; Yi A; Yim D; Jang MJ; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Lee EJ; Lee SH; Moon WK; Chang JM
    Korean J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):274-283. PubMed ID: 36996902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Radiologist Learning Curve.
    Miglioretti DL; Abraham L; Lee CI; Buist DSM; Herschorn SD; Sprague BL; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K;
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 30806595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening.
    Caumo F; Romanucci G; Hunter K; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Macaskill P; Houssami N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29557996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Single Center Evaluation of Comparative Breast Radiation dose of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM), Digital Mammography (DM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
    Bicchierai G; Busoni S; Tortoli P; Bettarini S; Naro FD; De Benedetto D; Savi E; Bellini C; Miele V; Nori J
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1342-1349. PubMed ID: 35065889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
    Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study.
    Lång K; Andersson I; Rosso A; Tingberg A; Timberg P; Zackrisson S
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):184-90. PubMed ID: 25929946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma.
    Onega T; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Lee CI; Henderson LM; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson ANA; Weaver D; Sprague BL; Bowles EJA; di Florio-Alexander RM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Dec; 202(3):505-514. PubMed ID: 37697031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparing accuracy of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography or synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening: baseline results of the MAITA RCT consortium.
    Giorgi Rossi P; Mancuso P; Pattacini P; Campari C; Nitrosi A; Iotti V; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Correale L; Riggi E; Giordano L; Segnan N; Di Leo G; Magni V; Sardanelli F; Fornasa F; Romanucci G; Montemezzi S; Falini P; Auzzi N; Zappa M; Ottone M; Mantellini P; Duffy SW; Armaroli P; ; ; Coriani C; Pescarolo M; Stefanelli G; Tondelli G; Beretti F; Caffarri S; Marchesi V; Canovi L; Colli M; Boschini M; Bertolini M; Ragazzi M; Pattacini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Campari C; Caroli S; Nitrosi A; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Mancuso P; Djuric O; Venturelli F; Vicentini M; Braghiroli MB; Lonetti J; Davoli E; Bonelli E; Fornasa F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Lucchi I; Martello G; Rossati C; Mantellini P; Ambrogetti D; Iossa A; Carnesciali E; Mazzalupo V; Falini P; Puliti D; Zappa M; Battisti F; Auzzi N; Verdi S; Degl'Innocenti C; Tramalloni D; Cavazza E; Busoni S; Betti E; Peruzzi F; Regini F; Sardanelli F; Di Leo G; Carbonaro LA; Magni V; Cozzi A; Spinelli D; Monaco CG; Schiaffino S; Benedek A; Menicagli L; Ferraris R; Favettini E; Dettori D; Falco P; Presti P; Segnan N; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Armaroli P; Correale L; Marra V; Milanesio L; Artuso F; Di Leo A; Castellano I; Riggi E; Casella D; Pitarella S; Vergini V; Giordano L; Duffy SW; Graewingholt A; Lang K; Falcini F
    Eur J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 199():113553. PubMed ID: 38262307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparing Mammographic Density Assessed by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis or Digital Mammography: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Tice JA; Gard CC; Miglioretti DL; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Joe BN; Ho TH; Kerlikowske K
    Radiology; 2022 Feb; 302(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 34812671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography Screening Performance on Successive Screening Rounds from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Coley RY; Lowry KP; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Su YR; Lee CI; Onega T; Bowles EJA; Herschorn SD; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2023 Jun; 307(5):e223142. PubMed ID: 37249433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program.
    Zuckerman SP; Conant EF; Keller BM; Maidment AD; Barufaldi B; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES
    Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):730-736. PubMed ID: 27467468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Feasibility study comparing synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography for simulated first round screening in a single BreastScreen NSW centre.
    Dhurandhar V; Bhola N; Chan M; Choi S; Chung TY; Giuffre B; Hunter N; Lee K; McKessar M; Reddy R; Roberts M; Shearman C; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Noakes J
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jun; 68(4):401-411. PubMed ID: 38698585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
    Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial.
    Weigel S; Gerss J; Hense HW; Krischke M; Sommer A; Czwoydzinski J; Lenzen H; Kerschke L; Spieker K; Dickmaenken S; Baier S; Urban M; Hecht G; Heidinger O; Kieschke J; Heindel W
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e020475. PubMed ID: 29764880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Jänsch A; Hacker A; Weinand S; Vogelmann T
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2301-2312. PubMed ID: 34694451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
    Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.