437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30159632)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of drugs for osteoporosis treatment in elderly Japanese women at high risk of fragility fractures: comparison of denosumab and weekly alendronate.
Yoshizawa T; Nishino T; Okubo I; Yamazaki M
Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Aug; 13(1):94. PubMed ID: 30159632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan.
Mori T; Crandall CJ; Ganz DA
Osteoporos Int; 2017 May; 28(5):1733-1744. PubMed ID: 28210776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of implementing guidelines for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in Japan.
Moriwaki K; Fukuda H
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Feb; 30(2):299-310. PubMed ID: 30610244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for high-risk postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Thailand.
Pongchaiyakul C; Nanagara R; Songpatanasilp T; Unnanuntana A
J Med Econ; 2020 Jul; 23(7):776-785. PubMed ID: 32063082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of osteoporosis screening and treatment strategy for postmenopausal Japanese women.
Yoshimura M; Moriwaki K; Noto S; Takiguchi T
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Feb; 28(2):643-652. PubMed ID: 27743068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost effectiveness of denosumab versus oral bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis in the US.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Yurgin N; Huang J; Viswanathan HN; Taylor D
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):485-97. PubMed ID: 23868102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Stevenson M; Jones ML; De Nigris E; Brewer N; Davis S; Oakley J
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jun; 9(22):1-160. PubMed ID: 15929857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of alendronate for the treatment of osteopenic postmenopausal women in Japan.
Moriwaki K; Komaba H; Noto S; Yanagisawa S; Takiguchi T; Inoue H; Toujo T; Fukagawa M; Takahashi HE
J Bone Miner Res; 2013 Feb; 28(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 22991163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of gastro-resistant risedronate tablets for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in France.
Hiligsmann M; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Mar; 30(3):649-658. PubMed ID: 30701342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan.
Moriwaki K; Mouri M; Hagino H
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jun; 28(6):1939-1950. PubMed ID: 28265718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost effectiveness of denosumab compared with oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporotic women in Belgium.
Hiligsmann M; Reginster JY
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Oct; 29(10):895-911. PubMed ID: 21692551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Jönsson B; Ström O; Eisman JA; Papaioannou A; Siris ES; Tosteson A; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):967-82. PubMed ID: 20936401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intervention thresholds for denosumab in the UK using a FRAX®-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ström O; Jönsson B; Kanis JA
Osteoporos Int; 2013 Apr; 24(4):1491-502. PubMed ID: 23224141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared with sequential denosumab/alendronate for older osteoporotic women in Japan.
Mori T; Crandall CJ; Fujii T; Ganz DA
Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Jul; 16(1):113. PubMed ID: 34264429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of four treatment strategies for postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis and a recent fracture in mainland China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Tian L; Luo C; Li YF; Wang QY; Qu XL; Yue C; Xu LL; Yang YY; Sheng ZF
Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Jul; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 37460858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation on the cost-effective threshold of osteoporosis treatment on elderly women in China using discrete event simulation model.
Ni W; Jiang Y
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Feb; 28(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 27581955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health-economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.
Brecht JG; Kruse HP; Möhrke W; Oestreich A; Huppertz E
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 2004; 24(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Denosumab: a cost-effective alternative for older men with osteoporosis from a Swedish payer perspective.
Parthan A; Kruse M; Agodoa I; Silverman S; Orwoll E
Bone; 2014 Feb; 59():105-13. PubMed ID: 24231131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential cost-effectiveness of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
Hiligsmann M; Reginster JY
Bone; 2010 Jul; 47(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 20303422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF COST EFFICACY OF DRUGS FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS: A META-ANALYSIS.
Albert SG; Reddy S
Endocr Pract; 2017 Jul; 23(7):841-856. PubMed ID: 28448754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
