271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30160004)
1. Effects of four soaps on skin trans-epidermal water loss and erythema index.
Khosrowpour Z; Ahmad Nasrollahi S; Ayatollahi A; Samadi A; Firooz A
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2019 Jun; 18(3):857-861. PubMed ID: 30160004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test.
Lakshmi C; Srinivas CR; Anand CV; Mathew AC
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 18713074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of a measure of acute irritation to predict the outcome of repeated usage of hand soap products.
Williams C; Wilkinson M; McShane P; Pennington D; Fernandez C; Pierce S
Br J Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 164(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 21332456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin biophysical assessments of four types of soaps by forearm in-use test.
Khosrowpour Z; Ahmad Nasrollahi S; Samadi A; Ayatollahi A; Shamsipour M; Rajabi-Esterabadi A; Yadangi S; Firooz A
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Jul; 21(7):3127-3132. PubMed ID: 34741581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair. Evaluation of the acute human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Jun; 30(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 8188884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of the cytotoxic and irritant effects of skin cleansing soaps.
Castanedo-Cázares JP; Cortés-García JD; Cornejo-Guerrero MF; Torres-Álvarez B; Hernández-Blanco D
Gac Med Mex; 2020; 156(5):418-423. PubMed ID: 33372931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a standardized testing procedure for assessing the irritation potential of occupational skin cleansers.
Elsner P; Seyfarth F; Antonov D; John SM; Diepgen T; Schliemann S
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Mar; 70(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 24588368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temperature dependency of skin susceptibility to water and detergents.
Ohlenschlaeger J; Friberg J; Ramsing D; Agner T
Acta Derm Venereol; 1996 Jul; 76(4):274-6. PubMed ID: 8869682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin barrier integrity and natural moisturising factor levels after cumulative dermal exposure to alkaline agents in atopic dermatitis.
Angelova-Fischer I; Dapic I; Hoek AK; Jakasa I; Fischer TW; Zillikens D; Kezic S
Acta Derm Venereol; 2014 Nov; 94(6):640-4. PubMed ID: 24531413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Study of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in man utilizing open application on subclinically irritated skin.
Lee CH; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 May; 30(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 8088139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate.
Friebe K; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2003 Jan; 148(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12534596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of a topical corticosteroid, a retinoid and a vitamin D3 derivative on sodium dodecyl sulphate induced skin irritation.
Le TK; De Mon P; Schalkwijk J; van der Valk PG
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jul; 37(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9255481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomical site differences of sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation: randomized controlled trial.
Leskur D; Bukić J; Petrić A; Zekan L; Rušić D; Šešelja Perišin A; Petrić I; Stipić M; Puizina-Ivić N; Modun D
Br J Dermatol; 2019 Jul; 181(1):175-185. PubMed ID: 30637727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo.
Fluhr JW; Akengin A; Bornkessel A; Fuchs S; Praessler J; Norgauer J; Grieshaber R; Kleesz P; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jul; 153(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 16029337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional assessment of a washing emulsion for sensitive skin: mild impairment of stratum corneum hydration, pH, barrier function, lipid content, integrity and cohesion in a controlled washing test.
Bornkessel A; Flach M; Arens-Corell M; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Skin Res Technol; 2005 Feb; 11(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 15691260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
