These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30160758)

  • 1. Round-robin-differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with monitoring signal disturbance.
    Wang R; Yin ZQ; Wang S; Chen W; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Lett; 2018 Sep; 43(17):4228-4231. PubMed ID: 30160758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plug-and-play round-robin differential phase-shift quantum key distribution.
    Mao QP; Wang L; Zhao SM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15435. PubMed ID: 29133835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Round-robin differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with a passive decoy state method.
    Liu L; Guo FZ; Qin SJ; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42261. PubMed ID: 28198808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental passive round-robin differential phase-shift quantum key distribution.
    Guan JY; Cao Z; Liu Y; Shen-Tu GL; Pelc JS; Fejer MM; Peng CZ; Ma X; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 May; 114(18):180502. PubMed ID: 26000991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Afterpulse effects in quantum key distribution without monitoring signal disturbance.
    Liu H; Yin ZQ; Wang ZH; Shan YG; Wang S; Chen W; Dong C; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Lett; 2023 Apr; 48(7):1558-1561. PubMed ID: 37221709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical round-robin differential phase-shift quantum key distribution.
    Zhang YY; Bao WS; Zhou C; Li HW; Wang Y; Jiang MS
    Opt Express; 2016 Sep; 24(18):20763-73. PubMed ID: 27607679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite-key analysis for round-robin-differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution.
    Liu H; Yin ZQ; Wang R; Lu FY; Wang S; Chen W; Huang W; Xu BJ; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Express; 2020 May; 28(10):15416-15423. PubMed ID: 32403569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved security bound for the round-robin-differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution.
    Yin ZQ; Wang S; Chen W; Han YG; Wang R; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Nat Commun; 2018 Jan; 9(1):457. PubMed ID: 29386505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental underwater quantum key distribution.
    Feng Z; Li S; Xu Z
    Opt Express; 2021 Mar; 29(6):8725-8736. PubMed ID: 33820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A high-speed multi-protocol quantum key distribution transmitter based on a dual-drive modulator.
    Korzh B; Walenta N; Houlmann R; Zbinden H
    Opt Express; 2013 Aug; 21(17):19579-92. PubMed ID: 24105505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical quantum key distribution protocol without monitoring signal disturbance.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto Y; Koashi M
    Nature; 2014 May; 509(7501):475-8. PubMed ID: 24848060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unconditional security of a three state quantum key distribution protocol.
    Boileau JC; Tamaki K; Batuwantudawe J; Laflamme R; Renes JM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Feb; 94(4):040503. PubMed ID: 15783540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental quantum key distribution with decoy states.
    Zhao Y; Qi B; Ma X; Lo HK; Qian L
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Feb; 96(7):070502. PubMed ID: 16606067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practical passive decoy state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with unstable sources.
    Liu L; Guo FZ; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11370. PubMed ID: 28900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite-key analysis for twin-field quantum key distribution based on generalized operator dominance condition.
    Wang RQ; Yin ZQ; Lu FY; Wang R; Wang S; Chen W; Huang W; Xu BJ; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Express; 2020 Jul; 28(15):22594-22605. PubMed ID: 32752517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental composable security decoy-state quantum key distribution using time-phase encoding.
    Yin HL; Liu P; Dai WW; Ci ZH; Gu J; Gao T; Wang QW; Shen ZY
    Opt Express; 2020 Sep; 28(20):29479-29485. PubMed ID: 33114847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proof-of-principle demonstration of parametric down-conversion source-based quantum key distribution over 40 dB channel loss.
    Zhang CH; Wang D; Zhou XY; Wang S; Zhang LB; Yin ZQ; Chen W; Han ZF; Guo GC; Wang Q
    Opt Express; 2018 Oct; 26(20):25921-25933. PubMed ID: 30469686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental decoy-state quantum key distribution with a sub-poissionian heralded single-photon source.
    Wang Q; Chen W; Xavier G; Swillo M; Zhang T; Sauge S; Tengner M; Han ZF; Guo GC; Karlsson A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Mar; 100(9):090501. PubMed ID: 18352685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
    Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization.
    Zhang X; Wang Y; Jiang M; Lu Y; Li H; Zhou C; Bao W
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Apr; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 33922572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.