These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30160774)

  • 1. Aesthetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery assessed by three evaluation modalities in relation to health-related quality of life.
    Dahlbäck C; Ringberg A; Manjer J
    Br J Surg; 2019 Jan; 106(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 30160774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™.
    Dahlbäck C; Ullmark JH; Rehn M; Ringberg A; Manjer J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):679-687. PubMed ID: 28536951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proposal for a gold standard for cosmetic evaluation after breast conserving therapy: Results from the St George and Wollongong Breast Boost trial.
    Merie R; Browne L; Cardoso JS; Cardoso MJ; Chin Y; Clark C; Graham P; Szwajcer A; Hau E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Dec; 61(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 28834326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of cosmetic outcome following breast-conserving therapy in trials: panel versus digitalized analysis and the role of PROMs.
    Lagendijk M; Vos EL; Nieboer D; Verhoef C; Corten EML; Koppert LB
    Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 29316049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Satisfaction with the Aesthetic Effect and Quality of Life for Women after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT)-Preliminary Research.
    Krzos A; Stanisławek A; Jędrych M; Łuczyk M; Ślusarska B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(23):. PubMed ID: 31775229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation.
    Heil J; Carolus A; Dahlkamp J; Golatta M; Domschke C; Schuetz F; Blumenstein M; Rauch G; Sohn C
    Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 21852135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In Search of a Gold Standard Scoring System for the Subjective Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Therapy.
    Racz JM; Hong NL; Latosinsky S
    Breast J; 2015; 21(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 25940058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving surgery.
    Dahlbäck C; Manjer J; Rehn M; Ringberg A
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 14(1):303. PubMed ID: 27923403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient satisfaction after unilateral oncoplastic volume displacement surgery for breast cancer, evaluated with the BREAST-Q™.
    Gardfjell A; Dahlbäck C; Åhsberg K
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 17(1):96. PubMed ID: 31167659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative three-dimensional simulation of the breast appearance after wide local excision or level one oncoplastic techniques for breast-conserving treatment does not set unrealistic expectations for aesthetic outcome: One-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
    Godden AR; Micha A; Barry PA; Krupa KDC; Pitches CA; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Oct; 97():230-236. PubMed ID: 39168032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: A case-controlled cohort study.
    Howes BH; Watson DI; Xu C; Fosh B; Canepa M; Dean NR
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Sep; 69(9):1184-91. PubMed ID: 27406255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The COSMAM TRIAL a prospective cohort study of quality of life and cosmetic outcome in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
    Catsman CJLM; Beek MA; Voogd AC; Mulder PGH; Luiten EJT
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):456. PubMed ID: 29688847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional simulation of aesthetic outcome from breast-conserving surgery compared with viewing photographs or standard care: randomized clinical trial.
    Godden AR; Micha A; Wolf LM; Pitches C; Barry PA; Khan AA; Krupa KDC; Kirby AM; Rusby JE
    Br J Surg; 2021 Oct; 108(10):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 34370833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life.
    Waljee JF; Hu ES; Ubel PA; Smith DM; Newman LA; Alderman AK
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jul; 26(20):3331-7. PubMed ID: 18612149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of the BCCT.core software in evaluation of breast cosmesis - A systematic review.
    Trakis S; Lord H; Graham P; Fernandez R
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2021 Oct; 65(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 33973358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT).
    Volders JH; Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Negenborn VL; Kolk RH; Lopes Cardozo AM; Bosch AM; de Widt-Levert LM; van der Veen H; Rijna H; Taets van Amerongen AH; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):649-657. PubMed ID: 27916314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oncoplastic Surgery: Does Patient and Medical Specialty Influences the Evaluation of Cosmetic Results?
    de Oliveira-Junior I; Brandini da Silva FC; Nazima F; Ribeiro JC; Castellani L; Zucca-Matthes G; Maciel MDS; Biller G; José da Silva J; Sarri AJ; Aloísio da Costa Vieira R
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):247-255.e3. PubMed ID: 33127303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aesthetics in breast conserving therapy: do objectively measured results match patients' evaluations?
    Heil J; Dahlkamp J; Golatta M; Rom J; Domschke C; Rauch G; Cardoso MJ; Sohn C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 20697820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy boost in breast-conserving therapy: Patient-reported outcome measures and aesthetic outcome.
    Kindts I; Laenen A; Christiaens M; Janssen H; Van Limbergen E; Weltens C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Jan; 195(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 30140943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective decision making between conventional and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy: An aesthetic and functional prospective cohort study.
    Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Újhelyi M; Kovács E; Udvarhelyi N; Mészáros N; Kenessey I; Kovács T; Kásler M; Mátrai Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):303-310. PubMed ID: 28069398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.