222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30160791)
1. Dynamic perspectives into the mechanisms of mutation-induced p53-DNA binding loss and inactivation using active perturbation theory: Structural and molecular insights toward the design of potent reactivators in cancer therapy.
Olotu FA; Soliman MES
J Cell Biochem; 2019 Jan; 120(1):951-966. PubMed ID: 30160791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insights into the Effect of the G245S Single Point Mutation on the Structure of p53 and the Binding of the Protein to DNA.
Lepre MG; Omar SI; Grasso G; Morbiducci U; Deriu MA; Tuszynski JA
Molecules; 2017 Aug; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 28813011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamics and Molecular Mechanisms of p53 Transcriptional Activation.
Offutt TL; Ieong PU; Demir Ö; Amaro RE
Biochemistry; 2018 Nov; 57(46):6528-6537. PubMed ID: 30388364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Structural basis of restoring sequence-specific DNA binding and transactivation to mutant p53 by suppressor mutations.
Suad O; Rozenberg H; Brosh R; Diskin-Posner Y; Kessler N; Shimon LJ; Frolow F; Liran A; Rotter V; Shakked Z
J Mol Biol; 2009 Jan; 385(1):249-65. PubMed ID: 18996393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Structure and Function of p53-DNA Complexes with Inactivation and Rescue Mutations: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study.
Kamaraj B; Bogaerts A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134638. PubMed ID: 26244575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From mutational inactivation to aberrant gain-of-function: Unraveling the structural basis of mutant p53 oncogenic transition.
Olotu FA; Soliman MES
J Cell Biochem; 2018 Mar; 119(3):2646-2652. PubMed ID: 29058783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biophysical simulations and structure-based modeling of residue interaction networks in the tumor suppressor proteins reveal functional role of cancer mutation hotspots in molecular communication.
Verkhivker GM
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2019 Jan; 1863(1):210-225. PubMed ID: 30339916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wild type p53 function in p53
Sundar D; Yu Y; Katiyar SP; Putri JF; Dhanjal JK; Wang J; Sari AN; Kolettas E; Kaul SC; Wadhwa R
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 38(1):103. PubMed ID: 30808373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Common cancer mutations R175H and R273H drive the p53 DNA-binding domain towards aggregation-prone conformations.
Li L; Li X; Tang Y; Lao Z; Lei J; Wei G
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2020 May; 22(17):9225-9232. PubMed ID: 32307496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the
Chitrala KN; Nagarkatti M; Nagarkatti P; Yeguvapalli S
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 31216622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structural modulation of p53TAD1-TAZ2 complex upon mutations and post-translational modification.
Ghosh A; Ganguly D
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2023 Jan; 41(1):176-185. PubMed ID: 34787057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer-associated p53 tetramerization domain mutants: quantitative analysis reveals a low threshold for tumor suppressor inactivation.
Kamada R; Nomura T; Anderson CW; Sakaguchi K
J Biol Chem; 2011 Jan; 286(1):252-8. PubMed ID: 20978130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mutants of the tumour suppressor p53 L1 loop as second-site suppressors for restoring DNA binding to oncogenic p53 mutations: structural and biochemical insights.
Merabet A; Houlleberghs H; Maclagan K; Akanho E; Bui TT; Pagano B; Drake AF; Fraternali F; Nikolova PV
Biochem J; 2010 Mar; 427(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 20113312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Molecular dynamics study on the inhibition mechanisms of ReACp53 peptide for p53-R175H mutant aggregation.
Lei J; Cai M; Shen Y; Lin D; Deng X
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Oct; 23(40):23032-23041. PubMed ID: 34612239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating DNA Binding and Conformational Variation in Temperature Sensitive p53 Cancer Mutants Using QM-MM Simulations.
Koulgi S; Achalere A; Sonavane U; Joshi R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143065. PubMed ID: 26579714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Targeting Y220C mutated p53 by Foeniculum vulgare-derived phytochemicals as cancer therapeutics.
Garg S; Singh J; Verma SR
J Mol Model; 2023 Jan; 29(2):55. PubMed ID: 36700982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of temperature on the p53-DNA binding interactions and their dynamical behavior: comparing the wild type to the R248Q mutant.
Barakat K; Issack BB; Stepanova M; Tuszynski J
PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27651. PubMed ID: 22110706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of R249S carcinogenic and H168R-R249S suppressor mutations on p53-DNA interaction, a multi scale computational study.
Rauf SM; Ismael M; Sahu KK; Suzuki A; Koyama M; Tsuboi H; Hatakeyama N; Endou A; Takaba H; Del Carpio CA; Kubo M; Miyamoto A
Comput Biol Med; 2010 May; 40(5):498-508. PubMed ID: 20403587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in silico algorithm for identifying stabilizing pockets in proteins: test case, the Y220C mutant of the p53 tumor suppressor protein.
Bromley D; Bauer MR; Fersht AR; Daggett V
Protein Eng Des Sel; 2016 Sep; 29(9):377-90. PubMed ID: 27503952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimentally guided structural modeling and dynamics analysis of Hsp90-p53 interactions: allosteric regulation of the Hsp90 chaperone by a client protein.
Blacklock K; Verkhivker GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):2962-78. PubMed ID: 24191708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
