These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30161184)

  • 21. The eccentricity effect of inhibition of return is resistant to practice.
    Bao Y; Sander T; Trahms L; Pöppel E; Lei Q; Zhou B
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21683762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inhibition of return in the visual field: the eccentricity effect is independent of cortical magnification.
    Bao Y; Lei Q; Fang Y; Tong Y; Schill K; Pöppel E; Strasburger H
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 23820946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Orienting of attention with and without cue awareness.
    Herreros L; Lambert AJ; Chica AB
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():165-171. PubMed ID: 28284987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aperture extent and stimulus speed affect the perception of visual acceleration.
    Mueller AS; González EG; McNorgan C; Steinbach MJ; Timney B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):743-752. PubMed ID: 27866263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
    Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial distribution of attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory following multiple cues.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():1-13. PubMed ID: 24793127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions.
    Poggel DA; Kasten E; Müller-Oehring EM; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 16777076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events.
    Watanabe K; Shimojo S
    Perception; 1998; 27(9):1041-54. PubMed ID: 10341934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting bias in perceived position using attention field models.
    Klein BP; Paffen CL; Pas SF; Dumoulin SO
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):15. PubMed ID: 27191943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spatial summation across the central visual field: implications for visual field testing.
    Khuu SK; Kalloniatis M
    J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.6. PubMed ID: 25583876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context.
    Bowman EM; Brown VJ; Kertzman C; Schwarz U; Robinson DL
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):431-43. PubMed ID: 8360720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Orienting of spatial attention in Huntington's Disease.
    Couette M; Bachoud-Levi AC; Brugieres P; Sieroff E; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 18242648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention.
    Chica AB; Sanabria D; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 17160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention effects on visuospatial working memory.
    Botta F; Santangelo V; Raffone A; Lupiáñez J; Belardinelli MO
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1590-602. PubMed ID: 20112160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Near peripheral motion detection threshold correlates with self-reported failures of attention in younger and older drivers.
    Henderson S; Gagnon S; Bélanger A; Tabone R; Collin C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Jul; 42(4):1189-94. PubMed ID: 20441830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight.
    Moores E; Tsouknida E; Romani C
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 25872179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The time course of attention modulation elicited by spatial uncertainty.
    Huang D; Liang H; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2017 Sep; 138():50-58. PubMed ID: 28733049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attentional capture by the onset and offset of motion signals outside the spatial focus of attention.
    Kawahara J; Yanase K; Kitazaki M
    J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23161003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.