BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30161185)

  • 1. Combining role-play with interactive simulation to motivate informed climate action: Evidence from the World Climate simulation.
    Rooney-Varga JN; Sterman JD; Fracassi E; Franck T; Kapmeier F; Kurker V; Johnston E; Jones AP; Rath K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202877. PubMed ID: 30161185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions.
    Roeser S
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jun; 32(6):1033-40. PubMed ID: 22519693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Promise and Limitations of Using Analogies to Improve Decision-Relevant Understanding of Climate Change.
    Raimi KT; Stern PC; Maki A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0171130. PubMed ID: 28135337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving Public Engagement With Climate Change: Five "Best Practice" Insights From Psychological Science.
    van der Linden S; Maibach E; Leiserowitz A
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 26581732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social Climate Science: A New Vista for Psychological Science.
    Pearson AR; Schuldt JP; Romero-Canyas R
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):632-650. PubMed ID: 27694459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ignorance or bias? Evaluating the ideological and informational drivers of communication gaps about climate change.
    Nisbet EC; Cooper KE; Ellithorpe M
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Apr; 24(3):285-301. PubMed ID: 25161166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: how to improve communication across ideological divides?
    Zia A; Todd AM
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Nov; 19(6):743-61. PubMed ID: 21560547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey.
    Hickman C; Marks E; Pihkala P; Clayton S; Lewandowski RE; Mayall EE; Wray B; Mellor C; van Susteren L
    Lancet Planet Health; 2021 Dec; 5(12):e863-e873. PubMed ID: 34895496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends.
    Guilbeault D; Becker J; Centola D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(39):9714-9719. PubMed ID: 30181271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How gains for SRHR in the UN have remained possible in a changing political climate.
    Aylward E; Halford S
    Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2020 Dec; 28(1):1741496. PubMed ID: 32254002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LandCaRe DSS--an interactive decision support system for climate change impact assessment and the analysis of potential agricultural land use adaptation strategies.
    Wenkel KO; Berg M; Mirschel W; Wieland R; Nendel C; Köstner B
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127 Suppl():S168-83. PubMed ID: 23582740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Climate change communication as political agenda and voters' behavior.
    Anwar MA; Zhou R; Sajjad A; Asmi F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(29):29946-29961. PubMed ID: 31414391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management?
    Lindner M; Fitzgerald JB; Zimmermann NE; Reyer C; Delzon S; van der Maaten E; Schelhaas MJ; Lasch P; Eggers J; van der Maaten-Theunissen M; Suckow F; Psomas A; Poulter B; Hanewinkel M
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():69-83. PubMed ID: 25156267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Climate Change Efficacy Messages and Efficacy Beliefs on Intended Political Participation.
    Hart PS; Feldman L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0157658. PubMed ID: 27487117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy, Action, and Support for Reducing Climate Change Risks.
    Bostrom A; Hayes AL; Crosman KM
    Risk Anal; 2019 Apr; 39(4):805-828. PubMed ID: 30368853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing effective communication materials on the health effects of climate change for vulnerable groups: a mixed methods study.
    Kreslake JM; Price KM; Sarfaty M
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Sep; 16(1):946. PubMed ID: 27604549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women in public life.
    Women 2000; 1992; (2):1-23. PubMed ID: 12317888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Public perception of climate change and implications for risk communication].
    Berger N; Lindemann AK; Böl GF
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2019 May; 62(5):612-619. PubMed ID: 30923847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paris Agreement on Climate Change: A Booster to Enable Sustainable Global Development and Beyond.
    Bhore SJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27854248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.