227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30165935)
1. Risk scores to guide referral decisions for people with suspected ovarian cancer in secondary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Ramaekers B; Lang S; Grimm S; Deshpande S; de Kock S; Armstrong N; Joore M; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Aug; 22(44):1-264. PubMed ID: 30165935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women.
Davenport C; Rai N; Sharma P; Deeks JJ; Berhane S; Mallett S; Saha P; Champaneria R; Bayliss SE; Snell KI; Sundar S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 7(7):CD011964. PubMed ID: 35879201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Faecal immunochemical tests to triage patients with lower abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer referrals in primary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Corro Ramos I; Lang S; Luyendijk M; Zaim R; Stirk L; Al M; Armstrong N; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2017 May; 21(33):1-234. PubMed ID: 28643629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
Campbell F; Thokala P; Uttley LC; Sutton A; Sutton AJ; Al-Mohammad A; Thomas SM
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(59):1-120. PubMed ID: 25265259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Garside R; Pitt M; Anderson R; Rogers G; Dyer M; Mealing S; Somerville M; Price A; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. PubMed ID: 17999840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review and economic evaluation of exercise referral schemes in primary care: a short report.
Campbell F; Holmes M; Everson-Hock E; Davis S; Buckley Woods H; Anokye N; Tappenden P; Kaltenthaler E
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jul; 19(60):1-110. PubMed ID: 26222987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study.
Van Calster B; Valentin L; Froyman W; Landolfo C; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Wynants L; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Savelli L; Fischerová D; Czekierdowski A; Kaijser J; Coosemans A; Scambia G; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
BMJ; 2020 Jul; 370():m2614. PubMed ID: 32732303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation.
Clarke A; Pulikottil-Jacob R; Grove A; Freeman K; Mistry H; Tsertsvadze A; Connock M; Court R; Kandala NB; Costa M; Suri G; Metcalfe D; Crowther M; Morrow S; Johnson S; Sutcliffe P
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(10):1-668, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 25634033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Models Combining Clinical Information, Ultrasound and Biochemical Markers for Ovarian Cancer: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Davenport CF; Rai N; Sharma P; Deeks J; Berhane S; Mallett S; Saha P; Solanki R; Bayliss S; Snell K; Sundar S
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jul; 14(15):. PubMed ID: 35892881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Joore M; Grutters J; Redekop K; Armstrong N; Lee K; Gloy V; Raatz H; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(16):1-243. PubMed ID: 23611316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation.
Pandor A; Goodacre S; Harnan S; Holmes M; Pickering A; Fitzgerald P; Rees A; Stevenson M
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Aug; 15(27):1-202. PubMed ID: 21806873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Medina-Lara A; Grigore B; Lewis R; Peters J; Price S; Landa P; Robinson S; Neal R; Hamilton W; Spencer AE
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Nov; 24(66):1-332. PubMed ID: 33252328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) and Expert Ultrasound Assessment in a Pelvic Mass Classified as Inconclusive by International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules.
Ngu SF; Chai YK; Choi KM; Leung TW; Li J; Kwok GST; Chu MMY; Tse KY; Cheung VYT; Ngan HYS; Chan KKL
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Feb; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35159077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic evaluation of an expert examiner and different ultrasound models in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Ramaekers BLT; Dirksen CD; Kooreman LFS; Slangen BFM; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Sep; 100():55-64. PubMed ID: 29957561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of non-invasive methods for assessment and monitoring of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Crossan C; Tsochatzis EA; Longworth L; Gurusamy K; Davidson B; Rodríguez-Perálvarez M; Mantzoukis K; O'Brien J; Thalassinos E; Papastergiou V; Burroughs A
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(9):1-409, v-vi. PubMed ID: 25633908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
