These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30166240)

  • 1. A comparison of perinephric fat surface area and Mayo Adhesive Probability score in predicting malignancy in T1 renal masses.
    Bernstein AP; Fram EB; Sankin A; Kovac E; Srivastava A; DiVito J; Stern JM
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):499.e17-499.e22. PubMed ID: 30166240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of perinephric fat measurements between malignant and benign renal tumours.
    Tsai JP; Lin DC; Huang WM; Chen M; Chen YH
    J Int Med Res; 2022 Sep; 50(9):3000605221125086. PubMed ID: 36172996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy.
    Davidiuk AJ; Parker AS; Thomas CS; Leibovich BC; Castle EP; Heckman MG; Custer K; Thiel DD
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1165-71. PubMed ID: 25192968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adherent perinephric fat at minimally invasive partial nephrectomy is associated with adverse peri-operative outcomes and malignant renal histology.
    Kocher NJ; Kunchala S; Reynolds C; Lehman E; Nie S; Raman JD
    BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 26573951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk Factors Influencing the Thickness and Stranding of Perinephric Fat of Mayo Adhesive Probability Score in Minimally Invasive Nephrectomy.
    Yao Y; Gong H; Pang Y; Gu L; Niu S; Xu Y; Li P; Liu K; Tang L; Xuan Y; Gao Y; Zhang X
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 May; 25():3825-3831. PubMed ID: 31118409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between visceral obesity and the clinicopathologic features of patients with small renal masses.
    Keehn A; Srivastava A; Maiman R; Taylor J; DiVito J; Ghavamian R; Stern JM
    J Endourol; 2015 Mar; 29(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 25203393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between renal mass biopsy and upstaging to perinephric fat involvement in a contemporary cohort of patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma.
    Salmasi A; Faiena I; Lenis AT; Pooli A; Johnson DC; Drakaki A; Gollapudi K; Blumberg J; Pantuck AJ; Chamie K
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):527.e13-527.e19. PubMed ID: 30228094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
    Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative evaluation of perinephric fat invasion in patients with renal cell carcinoma: correlation with pathological findings.
    Hedgire SS; Elmi A; Nadkarni ND; Cao K; McDermott S; Harisinghani MG
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 23206613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Is Associated With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Progression-free Survival.
    Thiel DD; Davidiuk AJ; Meschia C; Serie D; Custer K; Petrou SP; Parker AS
    Urology; 2016 Mar; 89():54-60. PubMed ID: 26723183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of anatomic and morphologic nomogram to predict malignant and high-grade disease in a cohort of patients with small renal masses.
    Bagrodia A; Harrow B; Liu ZW; Olweny EO; Faddegon S; Yin G; Tan YK; Han WK; Lotan Y; Margulis V; Cadeddu JA
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):37.e17-23. PubMed ID: 23628308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Is an Independent Computed Tomography Scan Predictor of Adherent Perinephric Fat in Open Partial Nephrectomy.
    Martin L; Rouviere O; Bezza R; Bailleux J; Abbas F; Schott-Pethelaz AM; Ruffion A; Paparel P
    Urology; 2017 May; 103():124-128. PubMed ID: 28161321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of Factors Influencing Mayo Adhesive Probability Score in Partial Nephrectomy.
    Ji C; Tang S; Yang K; Xiong G; Fang D; Zhang C; Li X; Zhou L
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Dec; 23():6026-6032. PubMed ID: 29261641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of Postoperative Risks in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using RENAL, Mayo Adhesive Probability and Renal Pelvic Score.
    Bier S; Aufderklamm S; Todenhöfer T; Kruck S; Schuster K; Rausch S; Othman A; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Schwentner C; Stenzl A; Bier G; Bedke J
    Anticancer Res; 2017 Mar; 37(3):1369-1373. PubMed ID: 28314305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting ease of perinephric fat dissection at time of open partial nephrectomy using preoperative fat density characteristics.
    Zheng Y; Espiritu P; Hakky T; Jutras K; Spiess PE
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6):872-80. PubMed ID: 24274617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic value of preoperative radiographic perinephric fat features in renal cell carcinoma patients undergoing surgery.
    Kuo YR; Lee YC; Wang CT; Liu WC; Ou CH; Lin KC; Cheng TH; Jan HC; Hu CY
    Asian J Surg; 2024 May; 47(5):2188-2194. PubMed ID: 38383186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usefulness of the mayo adhesive probability score as a predictive factor for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy: a retrospective case-control study.
    Hata J; Matsuoka Y; Onagi A; Honda-Takinami R; Matsuoka K; Sato Y; Akaihata H; Ogawa S; Kataoka M; Hosoi T; Kojima Y
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2021 Nov; 53(11):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 34510283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical predictors and significance of adherent perinephric fat assessed with Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score and perinephric fat surface density (PnFSD) at the time of partial nephrectomy for localized renal mass. A single high-volume referral center experience.
    DI Maida F; Vittori G; Campi R; Mari A; Tellini R; Sforza S; Sessa F; Lucarini S; Miele V; Vignozzi L; Masieri L; Carini M; Minervini A
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 32026669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stage T3a renal cell carcinoma: staging accuracy of CT for sinus fat, perinephric fat or renal vein invasion.
    Sokhi HK; Mok WY; Patel U
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 88(1045):20140504. PubMed ID: 25410425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Renal masses measuring under 2 cm: pathologic outcomes and associations with MRI features.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Wehrli NE; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Shaikh MB
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1311-6. PubMed ID: 24882784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.