These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3016774)

  • 1. The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation.
    Miliaressis E; Rompre PP; Laviolette P; Philippe L; Coulombe D
    Physiol Behav; 1986; 37(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 3016774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of pimozide on the reinforcing efficacy of central grey stimulation in the rat.
    Miliaressis E; Malette J; Coulombe D
    Behav Brain Res; 1986 Aug; 21(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 3755951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.
    Heyman GM; Kinzie DL; Seiden LS
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 88(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 3083455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.
    Hunt GE; Atrens DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Aug; 42(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 1513839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interactions between amygdaloid and hypothalamic self-stimulation: a re-examination.
    Kane F; Coulombe D; Miliaressis E
    Behav Brain Res; 1991 Aug; 44(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 1751008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automating the generation and collection of rate-frequency functions in a curve-shift brain stimulation reward paradigm.
    Ranaldi R; Ferguson S; Beninger RJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 1994 Aug; 53(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 7823619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Main effects of current and pimozide on prepared and learned self-stimulation behaviors are on performance not reward.
    Mekarski JE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1988 Dec; 31(4):845-53. PubMed ID: 3252276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative effectiveness of pimozide, haloperidol and trifluoperazine on self-stimulation rate-intensity functions.
    Lynch MR; Wise RA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Nov; 23(5):777-80. PubMed ID: 4080763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of peripheral and central dopamine blockade on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation: evidence for both reward and motor deficits.
    Stellar JR; Kelley AE; Corbett D
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1983 Mar; 18(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 6835998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between lick or lever-pressing contingent reward and the effects of neuroleptics thereon.
    Wauquier A; Niemegeers CJ
    Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1979 Jun; 239(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 39532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactions between alcohol and nicotine on intracranial self-stimulation and locomotor activity in rats.
    Schaefer GJ; Michael RP
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1992 Apr; 30(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 1591979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of pimozide on self-stimulation threshold under a continuous and fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.
    Boye SM; Rompré PP
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Aug; 78(2):243-5. PubMed ID: 8864057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociation of the attentional and motivational effects of pimozide on the threshold for rewarding brain stimulation.
    Bird M; Kornetsky C
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 1990 Feb; 3(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 2137697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential effects of drug treatments on nose-poke and bar-press self-stimulation.
    Gerhardt S; Liebman JM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Nov; 15(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 7312912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operant conditioning of hippocampal theta: dissociating reward from performance deficits.
    Fantie BD; Nakajima S
    Behav Neurosci; 1987 Oct; 101(5):626-33. PubMed ID: 3675840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task difficulty increases thresholds of rewarding brain stimulation.
    Fouriezos G; Bielajew C; Pagotto W
    Behav Brain Res; 1990 Feb; 37(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2310490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of catecholamine manipulations on three different self-stimulation behaviors.
    White N; Brown Z; Yachnin M
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1978 Sep; 9(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 714976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lateral hypothalamic stimulation gates nucleus gigantocellularis-induced aversion via a reward-independent process.
    Carr KD; Coons EE
    Brain Res; 1982 Jan; 232(2):293-316. PubMed ID: 7188027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Free-operant and auto-titration brain self-stimulation procedures in the rat: a comparison of drug effects.
    Schaefer GJ; Holtzman SG
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Jan; 10(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 441089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Median raphe injections of 8-OH-DPAT lower frequency thresholds for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation.
    Fletcher PJ; Tampakeras M; Yeomans JS
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1995 Sep; 52(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 7501680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.