These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30167894)

  • 21. The assessment of environmentally sensitive forest road construction in Calabrian pine forest areas of Turkey.
    Tunay M
    J Environ Biol; 2006 Jul; 27(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 17402245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facility Layout Planning with SHELL and Fuzzy AHP Method Based on Human Reliability for Operating Theatre.
    Lin Q; Wang D
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():8563528. PubMed ID: 30792832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial assessment of sediment risk with integrated entropy-based WASPAS and fuzzy clustering methods in Turkey: impact of forestry activities and meteorological factors.
    Akay AO; Senturk E; Akgul M; Demir M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Sep; 195(10):1201. PubMed ID: 37700100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An Extension of the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis with Hesitant Fuzzy Sets to Assess the Occupational Hazards in the Construction Industry.
    Heidary Dahooie J; Vanaki AS; Firoozfar HR; Zavadskas EK; Čereška A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32102295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Framework to Prioritize the Public Expectations from Water Treatment Plants based on Trapezoidal Type-2 Fuzzy Ahp Method.
    Yildiz A; Ayyildiz E; Taskin Gumus A; Ozkan C
    Environ Manage; 2021 Mar; 67(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 32990792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment and analysis of tree damage caused by forest road construction in a scotch pine stand: a case study from Alabarda/Bolu-Türkiye.
    Türk Y; Bodur M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Nov; 195(12):1481. PubMed ID: 37968416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects.
    Aminbakhsh S; Gunduz M; Sonmez R
    J Safety Res; 2013 Sep; 46():99-105. PubMed ID: 23932691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment.
    Sabahi F
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():204-216. PubMed ID: 29625186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping.
    Feizizadeh B; Shadman Roodposhti M; Jankowski P; Blaschke T
    Comput Geosci; 2014 Dec; 73():208-221. PubMed ID: 26089577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An Integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Studying Significant Factors Associated with Frequent Lane Changing.
    Moslem S; Farooq D; Jamal A; Almarhabi Y; Almoshaogeh M; Butt FM; Tufail RF
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Study on building index system of risk assessment of post-marketing Chinese patent medicine based on AHP-fuzzy neural network].
    Li Y; Xie Y; Fu Y
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 36(20):2828-30. PubMed ID: 22292377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of a framework for resilience measurement: Suggestion of fuzzy Resilience Grade (RG) and fuzzy Resilience Early Warning Grade (REWG).
    Omidvar M; Mazloumi A; Mohammad Fam I; Nirumand F
    Work; 2017; 56(3):463-474. PubMed ID: 28269808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems.
    Uzoka FM; Obot O; Barker K; Osuji J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 20633949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A GIS-MCDM-based road network planning for tourism development and management in Arasbaran forest, Iran.
    Talebi M; Majnounian B; Makhdoum M; Abdi E; Omid M; Marchi E; Laschi A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):647. PubMed ID: 31620901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the mid-Atlantic Region.
    Tran LT; Knight CG; O'Neill RV; Smith ER; Riitters KH; Wickham J
    Environ Manage; 2002 Jun; 29(6):845-59. PubMed ID: 11992175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multistage fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of landslide hazards based on a cloud model.
    Yao X; Deng H; Zhang T; Qin Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224312. PubMed ID: 31689296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Towards a Fuzzy Bayesian Network Based Approach for Safety Risk Analysis of Tunnel-Induced Pipeline Damage.
    Zhang L; Wu X; Qin Y; Skibniewski MJ; Liu W
    Risk Anal; 2016 Feb; 36(2):278-301. PubMed ID: 26224125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An approach for environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy inference rules.
    Topuz E; van Gestel CA
    Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():334-47. PubMed ID: 27131016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fuzzy risk assessment for mechanized underground coal mines in Turkey.
    Iphar M; Cukurluoz AK
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2020 Jun; 26(2):256-271. PubMed ID: 29493428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making approach for industrial green engineering.
    Chiou HK; Tzeng GH
    Environ Manage; 2002 Dec; 30(6):816-30. PubMed ID: 12402097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.