270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30168095)
1. The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm.
Olkoniemi H; Johander E; Kaakinen JK
Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 30168095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability to recognise emotions predicts the time-course of sarcasm processing: Evidence from eye movements.
Olkoniemi H; Strömberg V; Kaakinen JK
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1212-1223. PubMed ID: 30282526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: Evidence from eye movements.
Olkoniemi H; Ranta H; Kaakinen JK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):433-50. PubMed ID: 26371496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining the role of context in written sarcasm comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading.
Țurcan A; Howman H; Filik R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1966-1976. PubMed ID: 32658544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context.
Țurcan A; Filik R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1867-1893. PubMed ID: 27504677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of prosody and context in sarcasm comprehension: Behavioral and fMRI evidence.
Matsui T; Nakamura T; Utsumi A; Sasaki AT; Koike T; Yoshida Y; Harada T; Tanabe HC; Sadato N
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():74-84. PubMed ID: 27157883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual differences and emotional inferences during reading comprehension.
Gillioz C; Gygax P; Tapiero I
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):239-50. PubMed ID: 22774802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Adjustment of Complexity on Sarcasm Processing in Chinese: Evidence from Reading Time Indicators.
Li Y; Shi H; Li S; Gao L; Gao X
Brain Sci; 2023 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36831749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of emoticons in sarcasm comprehension in younger and older adults: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment.
Howman HE; Filik R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Nov; 73(11):1729-1744. PubMed ID: 32338575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Extra Interletter Spacing Help Text Reading in Skilled Adult Readers?
Perea M; Giner L; Marcet A; Gomez P
Span J Psychol; 2016 May; 19():E26. PubMed ID: 27210581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact.
Filik R; Țurcan A; Thompson D; Harvey N; Davies H; Turner A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2130-46. PubMed ID: 26513274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the difference between irony and sarcasm? An fMRI study.
Filik R; Ţurcan A; Ralph-Nearman C; Pitiot A
Cortex; 2019 Jun; 115():112-122. PubMed ID: 30807881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial Inferences in Narrative Comprehension: the Role of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory.
Irrazabal N; Burin D
Span J Psychol; 2016 Mar; 19():E11. PubMed ID: 26972773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When your mind skips what your eyes fixate: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading.
Schotter ER; Leinenger M; von der Malsburg T
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1884-1890. PubMed ID: 28766185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading.
Veldre A; Drieghe D; Andrews S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1612-1628. PubMed ID: 28414501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can We 'Read' the Eye-Movement Patterns of Readers? Unraveling the Relationship Between Reading Profiles and Processing Strategies.
Koornneef A; Mulders I
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 26996449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast and slow readers and the effectiveness of the spatial frequency content of text: Evidence from reading times and eye movements.
Jordan TR; Dixon J; McGowan VA; Kurtev S; Paterson KB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1066-71. PubMed ID: 27123680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using Sarcasm to Compliment: Context, Intonation, and the Perception of Statements with a Negative Literal Meaning.
Voyer D; Vu JP
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Jun; 45(3):615-24. PubMed ID: 25900533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinction between the literal and intended meanings of sentences: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of metaphor and sarcasm.
Uchiyama HT; Saito DN; Tanabe HC; Harada T; Seki A; Ohno K; Koeda T; Sadato N
Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):563-83. PubMed ID: 21333979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
