These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30168095)

  • 21. Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study.
    Scrimin S; Mason L
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):387-406. PubMed ID: 26010020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reading comprehension in aging: the role of working memory and metacomprehension.
    De Beni R; Borella E; Carretti B
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 Mar; 14(2):189-212. PubMed ID: 17364380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities.
    Payne BR; Grison S; Gao X; Christianson K; Morrow DG; Stine-Morrow EA
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 24291806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Online inferential and textual processing by adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during reading comprehension: Evidence from a probing method.
    Yeari M; Avramovich A; Schiff R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Jun; 39(5):485-501. PubMed ID: 27681540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Interacts with Ambiguity During Sentence Comprehension.
    Key-DeLyria SE; Bodner T; Altmann LJP
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Jun; 48(3):665-682. PubMed ID: 30612265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neural substrates of sarcasm: a functional magnetic-resonance imaging study.
    Uchiyama H; Seki A; Kageyama H; Saito DN; Koeda T; Ohno K; Sadato N
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1124(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 17092490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotional Processing of Ironic Versus Literal Criticism in Autistic and Nonautistic Adults: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    Barzy M; Filik R; Williams D; Ferguson HJ
    Autism Res; 2020 Apr; 13(4):563-578. PubMed ID: 32017394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Working memory capacity and sustained attention: A cognitive-energetic perspective.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):77-103. PubMed ID: 30998072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Individual differences in children's comprehension of temporal relations: Dissociable contributions of working memory capacity and working memory updating.
    Karlsson J; Jolles D; Koornneef A; van den Broek P; Van Leijenhorst L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Sep; 185():1-18. PubMed ID: 31077975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: Evidence from eye-tracking.
    Vasilev MR; Liversedge SP; Rowan D; Kirkby JA; Angele B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1484-1512. PubMed ID: 31436455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. From eye movements to scanpath networks: A method for studying individual differences in expository text reading.
    Ma X; Liu Y; Clariana R; Gu C; Li P
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Feb; 55(2):730-750. PubMed ID: 35445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vertical perceptual span and the processing of visual signals in reading.
    Cauchard F; Eyrolle H; Cellier JM; Hyönä J
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22043847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Object shape and orientation do not routinely influence performance during language processing.
    Rommers J; Meyer AS; Huettig F
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 24065373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age-related changes in reading comprehension: an individual-differences perspective.
    Hannon B; Daneman M
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):432-56. PubMed ID: 20183100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Missing the joke: Reduced rereading of garden-path jokes during mind-wandering.
    Zhang H; Qu C; Miller KF; Cortina KS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):638-648. PubMed ID: 31343250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The construction of visual-spatial situation models in children's reading and their relation to reading comprehension.
    Barnes MA; Raghubar KP; Faulkner H; Denton CA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Mar; 119():101-11. PubMed ID: 24315376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs.
    Ferguson HJ; Cane JE
    Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 1622():252-69. PubMed ID: 26119912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Don't believe what you read (only once): comprehension is supported by regressions during reading.
    Schotter ER; Tran R; Rayner K
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1218-26. PubMed ID: 24747167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reading comprehension and its relationship with working memory capacity when reading horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Walker R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1887-1897. PubMed ID: 28766371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hemispheric processing of mental representations during text comprehension: evidence for inhibition of inconsistent shape information.
    Briner SW; Virtue SM; Schutzenhofer MC
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():96-104. PubMed ID: 24956570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.