These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30168863)

  • 1. Why pro-life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics.
    Räsänen J
    Bioethics; 2018 Nov; 32(9):628-633. PubMed ID: 30168863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing.
    Räsänen J
    Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):656-662. PubMed ID: 27717058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing: A reply to Räsänen.
    Rodger D; Blackshaw BP; Wilcox C
    Bioethics; 2018 Mar; 32(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 29369381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen.
    Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
    Bioethics; 2019 Oct; 33(8):965-967. PubMed ID: 31389040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dubious defense of 'after-birth abortion': A reply to Räsänen.
    Kaczor C
    Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):132-137. PubMed ID: 29171674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.
    Beard M; Lynch S
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23637453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. If Abortion, then Infanticide.
    Hershenov DB; Hershenov RJ
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2017 Oct; 38(5):387-409. PubMed ID: 28766249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond Infanticide: How Psychological Accounts of Persons Can Justify Harming Infants.
    Rodger D; Blackshaw BP; Miller C
    New Bioeth; 2018 Jul; 24(2):106-121. PubMed ID: 29464993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion, infanticide and moral context.
    Porter L
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):350-2. PubMed ID: 23637451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clashes of consensus: on the problem of both justifying abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome and rejecting infanticide.
    Friberg-Fernros H
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2017 Jun; 38(3):195-212. PubMed ID: 28188420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Camosy C
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 23637431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Manninen BA
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 23637447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can infants have interests in continued life?
    Kaposy C
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2007; 28(4):301-30. PubMed ID: 17929196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.
    Rini RA
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.
    Wrigley A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e15-8. PubMed ID: 23637455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Viable Violinist.
    Hawking M
    Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 26423668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
    Giubilini A; Minerva F
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 22361296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The moral status of babies.
    McGee A
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 23637450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discussing infanticide.
    Singer P
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):260. PubMed ID: 23637423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential.
    Oakley J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):324-5. PubMed ID: 23637444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.