These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30168863)

  • 21. Does birth matter?
    Veit W
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Mar; 48(3):194-195. PubMed ID: 33593870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Infanticide and moral consistency.
    McMahan J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 23637426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The moral significance of being born.
    Levy N
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 23637446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Response to: is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?
    George RP
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):302. PubMed ID: 23637434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?
    Camosy C
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 23637433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Moral Significance of Abortion Inconsistency Arguments.
    Simkulet W
    Asian Bioeth Rev; 2022 Jan; 14(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 34729080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Killing fetuses and killing newborns.
    Di Nucci E
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle.
    Rocchi B
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 23637458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Some comments on the paper 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'.
    Kuhse H
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):323-4. PubMed ID: 23637442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals.
    Finnis J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):281-3. PubMed ID: 23637427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.
    Marquis D
    J Med Ethics; 2001 Dec; 27(6):363-9. PubMed ID: 11731597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on.
    Savulescu J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 23637422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.
    Beckwith FJ
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 23637449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential.
    Oakley J
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2012 Mar; 30(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 22924241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Infanticide and madness.
    George RP
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 23637432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What exactly did you claim?
    Häyry M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 25473863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "After birth" abortion: a biomedical and conceptual nonsense.
    Benagiano G; Landeweerd L; Brosens I
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jul; 26(11):1053-9. PubMed ID: 23495749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. After-birth abortion: the intuition argument.
    Lederman Z
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e5. PubMed ID: 23637457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tooley's immodest proposal: Abortion and Infanticide.
    Sommers CH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun; 15(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 11643787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion.
    Biegler P
    J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):323. PubMed ID: 23637441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.