These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30169331)

  • 1. The Impact of Levels of Discrimination on Vertical Equating in the Rasch Model.
    Humphrey SN
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):216-228. PubMed ID: 30169331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item set discrimination and the unit in the Rasch model.
    Humphry S
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 22805360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. IRT test equating in complex linkage plans.
    Battauz M
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):464-80. PubMed ID: 25106395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equating Errors and Scale Drift in Linked-Chain IRT Equating with Mixed-Format Tests.
    Hu B
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 29561741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items.
    Wang WC
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 9661731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DIF Cancellation in the Rasch Model.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):118-28. PubMed ID: 23816591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rasch simultaneous vertical equating for measuring reading growth.
    Lee OK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 12700428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 15243175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observed-score equating: an overview.
    von Davier AA
    Psychometrika; 2013 Oct; 78(4):605-23. PubMed ID: 24092480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach's model.
    Adroher ND; Kreiner S; Young C; Mills R; Tennant A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):141. PubMed ID: 31286889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling response dependence in the measurement of change using the Rasch model.
    Andrich D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3709-3725. PubMed ID: 28633605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo tests of the Rasch model based on scalability coefficients.
    Christensen KB; Kreiner S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):101-11. PubMed ID: 19341515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scale Anchoring with the Rasch Model.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 28453498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample Size and Statistical Conclusions from Tests of Fit to the Rasch Model According to the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (Rumm) Program in Health Outcome Measurement.
    Hagell P; Westergren A
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(4):416-431. PubMed ID: 28009589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for Local Dependence with the Rasch Model: The Paradox of Information Increase.
    Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):262-282. PubMed ID: 28027051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.