These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30169333)

  • 1. Detecting Rater Effects under Rating Designs with Varying Levels of Missingness.
    Stafford RE; Wolfe EW; Casablanca JM; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):243-257. PubMed ID: 30169333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Models and Indices for Detecting Rater Centrality.
    Wolfe EW; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(3):228-41. PubMed ID: 26753219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Repeated Ratings to Improve Measurement Precision in Incomplete Rating Designs.
    Jones E; Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(2):148-161. PubMed ID: 29894984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Family of Rater Accuracy Models.
    Wolfe EW; Jiao H; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 26075664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting differential rater functioning over time (DRIFT) using a Rasch multi-faceted rating scale model.
    Wolfe EW; Moulder BC; Myford CM
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 12011510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rater effect comparability in local independence and rater bundle models.
    Wolfe EW; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 24950533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):819-38. PubMed ID: 16320551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new item response theory model for rater centrality using a hierarchical rater model approach.
    Qiu XL; Chiu MM; Wang WC; Chen PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1854-1868. PubMed ID: 34725802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for identifying extreme OSCE examiners.
    Bartman I; Smee S; Roy M
    Clin Teach; 2013 Feb; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 23294740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining Rater Judgements in Music Performance Assessment using Many-Facets Rasch Rating Scale Measurement Model.
    Ooi PS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2019; 20(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 30789834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Hierarchical Rater Model for Longitudinal Data.
    Casabianca JM; Junker BW; Nieto R; Bond MA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):576-592. PubMed ID: 28846050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting Rater Biases in Sparse Rater-Mediated Assessment Networks.
    Wind SA; Ge Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 81(5):996-1022. PubMed ID: 34565815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of 360-degree instrumentation effects: application of the Rasch rating scale model.
    Kulas JT; Hannum KM
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 18250526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human ratings take time: A hierarchical facets model for the joint analysis of ratings and rating times.
    Jin KY; Eckes T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3535-3547. PubMed ID: 37919615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring Incomplete Rating Designs With Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA; Patil YJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Apr; 78(2):319-342. PubMed ID: 29795958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing and Validating a Scientific Multi-Text Reading Comprehension Assessment: In the Text Case of the Dispute of whether to Continue the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant Construction in Taiwan.
    Hsiao-Hui L; Tzeng YT
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):320-337. PubMed ID: 30169338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the quality of life in mild to very severe dementia: testing the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the German version of the QUALIDEM.
    Dichter MN; Schwab CG; Meyer G; Bartholomeyczik S; Dortmann O; Halek M
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2014 May; 26(5):825-36. PubMed ID: 24507554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In the eye of the beholder: the effect of rater variability and different rating scales on QTL mapping.
    Poland JA; Nelson RJ
    Phytopathology; 2011 Feb; 101(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 20955083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.