These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Impact of socioeconomic factors on paediatric cochlear implant outcomes. Sharma S; Bhatia K; Singh S; Lahiri AK; Aggarwal A Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():90-97. PubMed ID: 29106884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children. Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Pediatric cochlear implantation in residual hearing candidates. Gratacap M; Thierry B; Rouillon I; Marlin S; Garabedian N; Loundon N Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2015 Jun; 124(6):443-51. PubMed ID: 25586946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Development of P1 cortical auditory evoked potential in children presented with sensorineural hearing loss following cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study. Alvarenga Kde F; Vicente LC; Lopes RC; Ventura LM; Bevilacqua MC; Moret AL Codas; 2013; 25(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 24626977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Sequential bilateral cochlear implants in children and adolescents: Outcomes and prognostic factors. Baron S; Blanchard M; Parodi M; Rouillon I; Loundon N Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2019 Apr; 136(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 30314876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Early speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children at one-year post cochlear implantation. Chen Y; Wong LL; Zhu S; Xi X Res Dev Disabil; 2016; 49-50():1-12. PubMed ID: 26647002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation. van Loon MC; Smits C; Smit CF; Hensen EF; Merkus P Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e100-e106. PubMed ID: 28441230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results. Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. DTI study on rehabilitation of the congenital deafness auditory pathway and speech center by cochlear implantation. Wang H; Liang Y; Fan W; Zhou X; Huang M; Shi G; Yu H; Shen G Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Sep; 276(9):2411-2417. PubMed ID: 31127414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and speech perception in children with Nurotron(®) cochlear implants during four years of follow-up. Guo Q; Li Y; Fu X; Liu H; Chen J; Meng C; Long M; Chen X Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 85():170-7. PubMed ID: 27240518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Teagle HF; Roush PA; Woodard JS; Hatch DR; Zdanski CJ; Buss E; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 20090530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity". Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Nittrouer S Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures. Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of residual speech and auditory deprivation on speech perception of adult cochlear implant recipients. Derinsu U; Yüksel M; Geçici CR; Çiprut A; Akdeniz E Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Feb; 46(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 29945747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]