223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30169514)
1. Identifying the morphologic basis for radiomic features in distinguishing different Gleason grades of prostate cancer on MRI: Preliminary findings.
Penzias G; Singanamalli A; Elliott R; Gollamudi J; Shih N; Feldman M; Stricker PD; Delprado W; Tiwari S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Ponsky L; Fu P; Tiwari P; Viswanath S; Madabhushi A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200730. PubMed ID: 30169514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying in vivo DCE MRI markers associated with microvessel architecture and gleason grades of prostate cancer.
Singanamalli A; Rusu M; Sparks RE; Shih NN; Ziober A; Wang LP; Tomaszewski J; Rosen M; Feldman M; Madabhushi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):149-58. PubMed ID: 26110513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings.
Shiradkar R; Ghose S; Jambor I; Taimen P; Ettala O; Purysko AS; Madabhushi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 29734484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning-based radiomic models to predict intensity-modulated radiation therapy response, Gleason score and stage in prostate cancer.
Abdollahi H; Mofid B; Shiri I; Razzaghdoust A; Saadipoor A; Mahdavi A; Galandooz HM; Mahdavi SR
Radiol Med; 2019 Jun; 124(6):555-567. PubMed ID: 30607868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The potential of prostate gland radiomic features in identifying the Gleason score.
Gong L; Xu M; Fang M; He B; Li H; Fang X; Dong D; Tian J
Comput Biol Med; 2022 May; 144():105318. PubMed ID: 35245698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of Gleason score in prostate cancer patients based on radiomic features of transrectal ultrasound images.
Cheng T; Li H
Br J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 97(1154):415-421. PubMed ID: 38308030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics predicts preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis to support surgical decisions and is associated with tumor microenvironment in invasive breast cancer: A machine learning, multicenter study.
Yu Y; He Z; Ouyang J; Tan Y; Chen Y; Gu Y; Mao L; Ren W; Wang J; Lin L; Wu Z; Liu J; Ou Q; Hu Q; Li A; Chen K; Li C; Lu N; Li X; Su F; Liu Q; Xie C; Yao H
EBioMedicine; 2021 Jul; 69():103460. PubMed ID: 34233259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: A radiomic shape features study.
Cuocolo R; Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Romeo V; Verde F; Creta M; La Rocca R; Longo N; Pace L; Imbriaco M
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():144-149. PubMed ID: 31153556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.
Ginsburg SB; Algohary A; Pahwa S; Gulani V; Ponsky L; Aronen HJ; Boström PJ; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Brenner P; Delprado W; Thompson J; Pulbrock M; Taimen P; Villani R; Stricker P; Rastinehad AR; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):184-193. PubMed ID: 27990722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of quantitative parameters and radiomic features as inputs into machine learning models to predict the Gleason score of prostate cancer lesions.
Nai YH; Cheong DLH; Roy S; Kok T; Stephenson MC; Schaefferkoetter J; Totman JJ; Conti M; Eriksson L; Robins EG; Wang Z; Chua WY; Ang BWL; Singha AK; Thamboo TP; Chiong E; Reilhac A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jul; 100():64-72. PubMed ID: 36933775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive Prediction of High-Grade Prostate Cancer via Biparametric MRI Radiomics.
Gong L; Xu M; Fang M; Zou J; Yang S; Yu X; Xu D; Zhou L; Li H; He B; Wang Y; Fang X; Dong D; Tian J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 52(4):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 32212356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiomic Machine Learning for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with MRI: Comparison to ADC Values.
Bonekamp D; Kohl S; Wiesenfarth M; Schelb P; Radtke JP; Götz M; Kickingereder P; Yaqubi K; Hitthaler B; Gählert N; Kuder TA; Deister F; Freitag M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA; Schlemmer HP; Maier-Hein KH
Radiology; 2018 Oct; 289(1):128-137. PubMed ID: 30063191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI-based texture analysis of the primary tumor for pre-treatment prediction of bone metastases in prostate cancer.
Wang Y; Yu B; Zhong F; Guo Q; Li K; Hou Y; Lin N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 60():76-84. PubMed ID: 30917943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI-based radiomics signature for localized prostate cancer: a new clinical tool for cancer aggressiveness prediction? Sub-study of prospective phase II trial on ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (AIRC IG-13218).
Gugliandolo SG; Pepa M; Isaksson LJ; Marvaso G; Raimondi S; Botta F; Gandini S; Ciardo D; Volpe S; Riva G; Rojas DP; Zerini D; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Petralia G; Summers PE; Mistretta FA; Luzzago S; Cattani F; De Cobelli O; Cassano E; Cremonesi M; Bellomi M; Orecchia R; Jereczek-Fossa BA
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):716-728. PubMed ID: 32852590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of texture analysis based on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images in discriminating Gleason scores of prostate cancer.
Pan R; Yang X; Shu Z; Gu Y; Weng L; Jia Y; Feng J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1207-1218. PubMed ID: 32925162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Application of Biparametric MRI Texture Analysis for Detection and Evaluation of High-Grade Prostate Cancer in Zone-Specific Regions.
Niu XK; Chen ZF; Chen L; Li J; Peng T; Li X
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):549-556. PubMed ID: 29220213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.
Chen T; Li M; Gu Y; Zhang Y; Yang S; Wei C; Wu J; Li X; Zhao W; Shen J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):875-884. PubMed ID: 30230108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Explicit shape descriptors: novel morphologic features for histopathology classification.
Sparks R; Madabhushi A
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):997-1009. PubMed ID: 23850744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.
Yan C; Nakane K; Wang X; Fu Y; Lu H; Fan X; Feldman MD; Madabhushi A; Xu J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105528. PubMed ID: 32470903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided classification of prostate cancer grade groups from MRI images using texture features and stacked sparse autoencoder.
Abraham B; Nair MS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Nov; 69():60-68. PubMed ID: 30205334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
