164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30169836)
1. ESTIMATION OF EFFECTIVE DOSE OF DENTAL X-RAY DEVICES.
Qiang W; Qiang F; Lin L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):417-421. PubMed ID: 30169836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in Estimated Thyroid, Salivary Gland, Brain, and Eye Lens Doses From Intraoral Dental Radiography Over Seven Decades (1940 TO 2009).
Fontana RC; Pasqual E; Miller DL; Simon SL; Cardis E; Thierry-Chef I
Health Phys; 2020 Feb; 118(2):136-148. PubMed ID: 31634260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose in dental radiology.
Cohnen M; Kemper J; Möbes O; Pawelzik J; Mödder U
Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):634-7. PubMed ID: 11870479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ESTIMATING RADIATION DOSE TO MAJOR ORGANS IN DENTAL X-RAY EXAMINATIONS: A PHANTOM STUDY.
Li Y; Huang B; Cao J; Fang T; Liu G; Li X; Wu J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 33320946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doses in eye lens, thyroid, salivary glands, mammary glands, and gonads, due to radiation scattered in dental orthopantomography.
Campillo-Rivera GE; Vázquez-Bañuelos J; García-Duran Á; Escalona-Llaguno MI; Arteaga MV; Vega-Carrillo HR
Appl Radiat Isot; 2019 Apr; 146():57-60. PubMed ID: 30753985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms.
Theodorakou C; Walker A; Horner K; Pauwels R; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R;
Br J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 85(1010):153-60. PubMed ID: 22308220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation exposure in perfusion CT of the brain.
Ringelstein A; Lechel U; Fahrendorf DM; Altenbernd JC; Forsting M; Schlamann M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 24378887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significant reduction in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) eye dose through the use of leaded glasses.
Prins R; Dauer LT; Colosi DC; Quinn B; Kleiman NJ; Bohle GC; Holohan B; Al-Najjar A; Fernandez T; Bonvento M; Faber RD; Ching H; Goren AD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 21802322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques.
Cordasco G; Portelli M; Militi A; Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Gatto E; Lucchese A
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():24. PubMed ID: 24325970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
