These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30170262)

  • 1. Midwifery continuity of carer: Developing a realist evaluation framework to evaluate the implementation of strategic change in Scotland.
    McInnes RJ; Martin CJH; MacArthur J
    Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():103-110. PubMed ID: 30170262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Midwives' views of changing to a Continuity of Midwifery Care (CMC) model in Scotland: A baseline survey.
    Hollins Martin CJ; MacArthur J; Martin CR; McInnes RJ
    Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e409-e419. PubMed ID: 31780253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing continuity of midwife carer - just a friendly face? A realist evaluation.
    McInnes RJ; Aitken-Arbuckle A; Lake S; Hollins Martin C; MacArthur J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Apr; 20(1):304. PubMed ID: 32293422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The key components of a successful model of midwifery-led continuity of carer, without continuity at birth: findings from a qualitative implementation evaluation.
    Dharni N; Essex H; Bryant MJ; Cronin de Chavez A; Willan K; Farrar D; Bywater T; Dickerson J;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):205. PubMed ID: 33711957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empowering change: realist evaluation of a Scottish Government programme to support normal birth.
    Cheyne H; Abhyankar P; McCourt C
    Midwifery; 2013 Oct; 29(10):1110-21. PubMed ID: 23968777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice.
    Collins CT; Fereday J; Pincombe J; Oster C; Turnbull D
    Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 19781827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuity of midwifery care for rural women through caseload group practice: Delivering for almost 20 years.
    Haines HM; Baker J; Marshall D
    Aust J Rural Health; 2015 Dec; 23(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 26683716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the 'work' of caseload midwives: A mixed-methods exploration of two caseload midwifery models in Victoria, Australia.
    Newton MS; McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Willis KF
    Women Birth; 2016 Jun; 29(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 26631349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The experiences of new graduate midwives working in midwifery continuity of care models in Australia.
    Cummins AM; Denney-Wilson E; Homer CS
    Midwifery; 2015 Apr; 31(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 25640822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour.
    Freeman LM; Adair V; Timperley H; West SH
    Women Birth; 2006 Dec; 19(4):97-105. PubMed ID: 17070742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does continuity of carer matter to women from minority ethnic groups?
    McCourt C; Pearce A
    Midwifery; 2000 Jun; 16(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 11151550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing caseload and non-caseload midwives' burnout levels and professional attitudes: A national, cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives working in the public maternity system.
    Dawson K; Newton M; Forster D; McLachlan H
    Midwifery; 2018 Aug; 63():60-67. PubMed ID: 29803988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring midwifery students' views and experiences of caseload midwifery: A cross-sectional survey conducted in Victoria, Australia.
    Dawson K; Newton M; Forster D; McLachlan H
    Midwifery; 2015 Feb; 31(2):e7-e15. PubMed ID: 25451548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midwife experiences of providing continuity of carer: A qualitative systematic review.
    Pace CA; Crowther S; Lau A
    Women Birth; 2022 May; 35(3):e221-e232. PubMed ID: 34253467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalisation process theory as a conceptual framework for continuity of carer implementation.
    Corrigan AE; Lake S; McInnes RJ
    Women Birth; 2021 Mar; 34(2):e204-e209. PubMed ID: 32139185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme.
    Farquhar M; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Todd C
    Midwifery; 2000 Mar; 16(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 11139860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Project20: Maternity care mechanisms that improve (or exacerbate) health inequalities. A realist evaluation.
    Rayment-Jones H; Harris J; Harden A; Turienzo CF; Sandall J
    Women Birth; 2023 May; 36(3):e314-e327. PubMed ID: 36443217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midwives' perceptions of their role within the context of maternity service reform: An Appreciative Inquiry.
    Sidebotham M; Fenwick J; Rath S; Gamble J
    Women Birth; 2015 Jun; 28(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 25582894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working in caseload midwifery care: the experience of midwives working in a birth centre in North Queensland.
    Edmondson MC; Walker SB
    Women Birth; 2014 Mar; 27(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 24148158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The feasibility of caseload midwifery in rural Australia: a literature review.
    Brown M; Dietsch E
    Women Birth; 2013 Mar; 26(1):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23010666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.