These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30170969)

  • 21. Facial soft tissue thickness among various vertical facial patterns in adult Pakistani subjects.
    Jeelani W; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():517.e1-517.e6. PubMed ID: 26476716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Golden Proportion Analysis of Dental-Skeletal Patterns of Class II and III Patients Pre and Post Orthodontic-orthognathic Treatment.
    Bragatto FP; Chicarelli M; Kasuya AV; Takeshita WM; Iwaki-Filho L; Iwaki LC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Sep; 17(9):728-733. PubMed ID: 27733715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Facial Golden Proportions among North Maharashtri-an Population.
    Sunilkumar LN; Jadhav KS; Nazirkar G; Singh S; Nagmode PS; Ali FM
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Jun; 5(3):48-54. PubMed ID: 24155602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Role of Ideal Angles, Ratios, and Divine Proportions in Aesthetic Evaluation of Adolescents.
    Malkoc S; Fidancioglu A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 40(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 26510875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Esthetic proportions of maxillary anterior tooth among 300 normal occlusion college students in Shanxi province].
    Yang HX; Li FL; Li L
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 57(4):352-357. PubMed ID: 35368161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions.
    Hasanreisoglu U; Berksun S; Aras K; Arslan I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 16316799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique.
    Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20542444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proportions of maxillary anterior teeth relative to each other and to golden standard in tabriz dental faculty students.
    Parnia F; Hafezeqoran A; Mahboub F; Moslehifard E; Koodaryan R; Moteyagheni R; Saleh Saber F
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2010; 4(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 22991604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Matoula S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 16539543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the golden proportion in natural facial esthetics: A systematic review.
    Londono J; Ghasmi S; Lawand G; Mirzaei F; Akbari F; Dashti M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):804-810. PubMed ID: 35738927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Relationship Between the Facial Proportion Changes in Hard Tissue and the Satisfaction of Patients After Reduction Malarplasty: a Research Based on Three-Dimensional Cephalometry.
    Yang F; Qi Z; Du L; Song G; Zong X; Jin X
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Jun; 44(3):750-763. PubMed ID: 32107590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces.
    Pancherz H; Knapp V; Erbe C; Heiss AM
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20209174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An investigation of the esthetic indicators of maxillary anterior teeth in young Turkish people.
    Özdemir H; Köseoğlu M; Bayindir F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):583-588. PubMed ID: 29724547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phenotype-genotype correlations of facial width and height proportions in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Moreno Uribe LM; Ray A; Blanchette DR; Dawson DV; Southard TE
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Apr; 18 Suppl 1(0 1):100-8. PubMed ID: 25865538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions.
    Rongo R; Antoun JS; Lim YX; Dias G; Valletta R; Farella M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):788-94. PubMed ID: 24559507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Turkish young adults: anthropometric measurements.
    Ozdemir ST; Sigirli D; Ercan I; Cankur NS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 33(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 19089493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.