These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30171401)

  • 1. Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity.
    Aday JS; Carlson JM
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 30171401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-retest reliability of attention bias for food: Robust eye-tracking and reaction time indices.
    van Ens W; Schmidt U; Campbell IC; Roefs A; Werthmann J
    Appetite; 2019 May; 136():86-92. PubMed ID: 30682381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the psychometric properties of dot-probe attention measures using response-based computation.
    Evans TC; Britton JC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Sep; 60():95-103. PubMed ID: 29580549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability measures in the dot-probe task among people with social anxiety disorder.
    Molloy A; Anderson PL
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Sep; 32(9):883-888. PubMed ID: 32525343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability (or lack thereof) of smartphone ecological momentary assessment of visual dot probe attention bias toward threat indices.
    Zainal NH; Jacobson NC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2024 Mar; 82():101918. PubMed ID: 37907019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moderators of age effects on attention bias toward threat and its association with anxiety.
    Namaky N; Beltzer ML; Werntz AJ; Lambert AE; Isaacowitz DM; Teachman BA
    J Affect Disord; 2017 Jul; 216():46-57. PubMed ID: 27855961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early and late dot-probe attentional bias to mild and high threat pictures: Relations with EEG theta/beta ratio, self-reported trait attentional control, and trait anxiety.
    van Son D; Angelidis A; Hagenaars MA; van der Does W; Putman P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Dec; 55(12):e13274. PubMed ID: 30132917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.
    Kappenman ES; Farrens JL; Luck SJ; Proudfit GH
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1368. PubMed ID: 25538644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research.
    Price RB; Kuckertz JM; Siegle GJ; Ladouceur CD; Silk JS; Ryan ND; Dahl RE; Amir N
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):365-76. PubMed ID: 25419646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights.
    Price RB; Brown V; Siegle GJ
    Biol Psychiatry; 2019 Apr; 85(7):606-612. PubMed ID: 30449531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brief time course of trait anxiety-related attentional bias to fear-conditioned stimuli: Evidence from the dual-RSVP task.
    Booth RW
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 54():71-76. PubMed ID: 27393891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of the diffusion model on dot-probe task performance in children with behavioral inhibition.
    Wise S; Huang-Pollock C; Pérez-Edgar K
    Psychol Res; 2022 Apr; 86(3):831-843. PubMed ID: 34047824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207695. PubMed ID: 30481190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interaction effect of attentional bias and attentional control on dispositional anxiety among adolescents.
    Ho SMY; Yeung D; Mak CWY
    Br J Psychol; 2017 Aug; 108(3):564-582. PubMed ID: 27678018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental control of conflict in a predictive visual probe task: Highly reliable bias scores related to anxiety.
    Gladwin TE; Halls M; Vink M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jul; 218():103357. PubMed ID: 34175671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of priming in a cued dot-probe task on appearance-related attentional biases in women.
    Lane BR; Mulgrew KE; Mahar D; White MJ; Loughnan SA
    Int J Eat Disord; 2017 Jul; 50(7):817-825. PubMed ID: 28252801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Suicide Dot Probe Task: Psychometric properties and validity in relation to suicide-related outcomes.
    Rogers ML; Carosa CL; Haliczer LA; Hughes CD; Schofield CA; Armey MF
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2023 Dec; 53(6):1010-1024. PubMed ID: 37702551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two probes and better than one: Development of a psychometrically reliable variant of the attentional probe task.
    Grafton B; Teng S; MacLeod C
    Behav Res Ther; 2021 Mar; 138():103805. PubMed ID: 33485106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional Bias in Children with Asthma with and without Anxiety Disorders.
    Dudeney J; Sharpe L; Sicouri G; Lorimer S; Dear BF; Jaffe A; Selvadurai H; Hunt C
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1635-1646. PubMed ID: 28066857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do not look away! Spontaneous frontal EEG theta/beta ratio as a marker for cognitive control over attention to mild and high threat.
    Angelidis A; Hagenaars M; van Son D; van der Does W; Putman P
    Biol Psychol; 2018 May; 135():8-17. PubMed ID: 29518523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.