200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30173123)
1. DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples.
Alladio E; Omedei M; Cisana S; D'Amico G; Caneparo D; Vincenti M; Garofano P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():143-150. PubMed ID: 30173123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. STRmix
Noël S; Noël J; Granger D; Lefebvre JF; Séguin D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():24-31. PubMed ID: 30947115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio.
Foley MM
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and validation of Kongoh ver. 3.0.1: Open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation in the GlobalFiler system based on a quantitative continuous model.
Manabe S; Fukagawa T; Fujii K; Mizuno N; Sekiguchi K; Akane A; Tamaki K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2022 Feb; 54():101972. PubMed ID: 34629243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
Pfeifer CM; Klein-Unseld R; Klintschar M; Wiegand P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comment on "DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples" by Alladio et al.
Taylor DA; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():e248-e251. PubMed ID: 30890320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative models used to interpret complex STR DNA profiles.
Bleka Ø; Benschop CCG; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():85-96. PubMed ID: 27529774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256714. PubMed ID: 34534241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developmental validation of PACE™: Automated artifact identification and contributor estimation for use with GlobalFiler™ and PowerPlex® fusion 6c generated data.
Marciano MA; Adelman JD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102140. PubMed ID: 31536876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open source software EuroForMix can be used to analyse complex SNP mixtures.
Bleka Ø; Eduardoff M; Santos C; Phillips C; Parson W; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():105-110. PubMed ID: 28942111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
