476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30173314)
1. Testing alternative regression models to predict utilities: mapping the QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L and the SF-6D.
Lamu AN; Olsen JA
Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2823-2839. PubMed ID: 30173314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mapping the Chinese Version of the EORTC QLQ-BR53 Onto the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Scores.
Liu T; Li S; Wang M; Sun Q; Chen G
Patient; 2020 Oct; 13(5):537-555. PubMed ID: 32382953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mapping the cancer-specific QLQ-C30 onto the generic EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in colorectal cancer patients.
Ameri H; Yousefi M; Yaseri M; Nahvijou A; Arab M; Akbari Sari A
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Feb; 19(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 30173585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping QLQ-C30 Onto EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D-V2 in Patients With Colorectal and Breast Cancer From a Developing Country.
Yousefi M; Nahvijou A; Sari AA; Ameri H
Value Health Reg Issues; 2021 May; 24():57-66. PubMed ID: 33508752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D instruments.
Kontodimopoulos N; Aletras VH; Paliouras D; Niakas D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19558372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ H&N35 to the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D for papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Huang D; Zeng D; Tang Y; Jiang L; Yang Q
Qual Life Res; 2024 Feb; 33(2):491-505. PubMed ID: 37938402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do country-specific preference weights matter in the choice of mapping algorithms? The case of mapping the Diabetes-39 onto eight country-specific EQ-5D-5L value sets.
Lamu AN; Chen G; Gamst-Klaussen T; Olsen JA
Qual Life Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1801-1814. PubMed ID: 29569014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the mapping between EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Khan I; Morris S; Pashayan N; Matata B; Bashir Z; Maguirre J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Apr; 14():60. PubMed ID: 27072351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the performance of algorithms mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D index in a metastatic colorectal cancer cost-effectiveness model.
Franken MD; de Hond A; Degeling K; Punt CJA; Koopman M; Uyl-de Groot CA; Versteegh MM; van Oijen MGH
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jul; 18(1):240. PubMed ID: 32690011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Selecting Covariates Using Factor Analysis in Mapping Algorithms Improve Predictive Accuracy? A Case of Predicting EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utilities from the Women's Health Questionnaire.
Kaambwa B; Smith C; de Lacey S; Ratcliffe J
Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 30314622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-3L: assessing the external validity of existing mapping algorithms.
Doble B; Lorgelly P
Qual Life Res; 2016 Apr; 25(4):891-911. PubMed ID: 26391884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G onto EQ-5D-5L index for patients with cancer.
Hagiwara Y; Shiroiwa T; Taira N; Kawahara T; Konomura K; Noto S; Fukuda T; Shimozuma K
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Nov; 18(1):354. PubMed ID: 33143687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indirect and Direct Mapping of the Cancer-Specific EORTC QLQ-C30 onto EQ-5D-5L Utility Scores.
Meunier A; Soare A; Chevrou-Severac H; Myren KJ; Murata T; Longworth L
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2022 Jan; 20(1):119-131. PubMed ID: 34554442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mapping the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores to EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D utility scores in patients with schizophrenia.
Abdin E; Chong SA; Seow E; Verma S; Tan KB; Subramaniam M
Qual Life Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):177-186. PubMed ID: 30382480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mapping of the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-5L index in patients with lymphomas.
Xu RH; Wong ELY; Jin J; Dou Y; Dong D
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Dec; 21(9):1363-1373. PubMed ID: 32960388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mapping between headache specific and generic preference-based health-related quality of life measures.
Khan K; Mistry H; Matharu M; Norman C; Petrou S; Stewart K; Underwood M; Achana F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):277. PubMed ID: 36289468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Converting Parkinson-Specific Scores into Health State Utilities to Assess Cost-Utility Analysis.
Chen G; Garcia-Gordillo MA; Collado-Mateo D; Del Pozo-Cruz B; Adsuar JC; Cordero-Ferrera JM; Abellán-Perpiñán JM; Sánchez-Martínez FI
Patient; 2018 Dec; 11(6):665-675. PubMed ID: 29876865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 onto EQ-5D-5L in Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Ameri H; Yousefi M; Yaseri M; Nahvijou A; Arab M; Akbari Sari A
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2020 Mar; 51(1):196-203. PubMed ID: 30977049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale to estimate health state utility values: mapping from the MSIS-29, version 2, to the EQ-5D and the SF-6D.
Hawton A; Green C; Telford C; Zajicek J; Wright D
Value Health; 2012 Dec; 15(8):1084-91. PubMed ID: 23244811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does linear equating improve prediction in mapping? Crosswalking MacNew onto EQ-5D-5L value sets.
Lamu AN
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Aug; 21(6):903-915. PubMed ID: 32300999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
