These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30173421)

  • 1. Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer Using the Combination of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Across Tumor Diffusion Volume and Clinical Information: A Pilot Study.
    Zhang Z; Xu H; Xue Y; Li J; Ye Q
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):556-564. PubMed ID: 30173421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Histogram analysis of stretched-exponential and monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging models for distinguishing low and intermediate/high gleason scores in prostate carcinoma.
    Liu W; Liu XH; Tang W; Gao HB; Zhou BN; Zhou LP
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):491-498. PubMed ID: 29412492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Luminal Water Imaging: Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) and PI-RADS for Characterization of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.
    Hectors SJ; Said D; Gnerre J; Tewari A; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jul; 52(1):271-279. PubMed ID: 31961049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
    Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The performance of intravoxel-incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging derived hypoxia for the risk stratification of prostate cancer in peripheral zone.
    Chen Z; Xue Y; Zhang Z; Li W; Wen M; Zhao Y; Li J; Weng Z; Ye Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108865. PubMed ID: 32058895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer.
    Nowak J; Malzahn U; Baur AD; Reichelt U; Franiel T; Hamm B; Durmus T
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 25505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma.
    Lim C; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Shabana WM; Quon JS; El-Khodary M; Thornhill RE; El Hallani S; Schieda N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):726-36. PubMed ID: 26303719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.
    Chen T; Li M; Gu Y; Zhang Y; Yang S; Wei C; Wu J; Li X; Zhao W; Shen J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):875-884. PubMed ID: 30230108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions with high and with low Gleason score by diffusion-weighted MRI.
    Barbieri S; Brönnimann M; Boxler S; Vermathen P; Thoeny HC
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1547-1555. PubMed ID: 27300199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate Cancer: Utility of Whole-Lesion Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Metrics for Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Ream JM; Nolan P; Rusinek H; Deng FM; Taneja SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1208-14. PubMed ID: 26587927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
    Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histogram analysis of MR quantitative parameters: are they correlated with prognostic factors in prostate cancer?
    Chen Y; Meng T; Cao W; Zhang W; Ling J; Wen Z; Qian L; Guo Y; Lin J; Wang H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 May; 49(5):1534-1544. PubMed ID: 38546826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI-based risk score for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL.
    Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Dwivedi AK; Bora GS; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 28872226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis and Grading of Prostate Cancer by Relaxation Maps From Synthetic MRI.
    Cui Y; Han S; Liu M; Wu PY; Zhang W; Zhang J; Li C; Chen M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):552-564. PubMed ID: 32027071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nine-year Follow-up for a Study of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Prospective Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort.
    Henderson DR; de Souza NM; Thomas K; Riches SF; Morgan VA; Sohaib SA; Dearnaley DP; Parker CC; van As NJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1028-33. PubMed ID: 26482887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing diagnostic accuracy of luminal water imaging with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: A quantitative MRI study.
    Sabouri S; Chang SD; Goldenberg SL; Savdie R; Jones EC; Black PC; Fazli L; Kozlowski P
    NMR Biomed; 2019 Feb; 32(2):e4048. PubMed ID: 30575145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of computed diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting aggressiveness of prostate cancer.
    Waseda Y; Yoshida S; Takahara T; Kwee TC; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):490-496. PubMed ID: 28152258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.