558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30174182)
21. Unexplained Variation in Benefit of Treatment of Congenital Unilateral Aural Atresia: A Review of the Literature.
Vogt K; Desmet J; Janssen AM; Agterberg MJH; Snik AFM
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 33567425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study.
Steel MM; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117611. PubMed ID: 25668423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcome prediction for Bonebridge candidates based on audiological indication criteria.
Wimmer W; von Werdt M; Mantokoudis G; Anschuetz L; Kompis M; Caversaccio M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Oct; 46(5):681-686. PubMed ID: 30635142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Audiological outcomes in patients with congenital aural atresia implanted with transcutaneous active bone conduction hearing implant.
Zernotti ME; Chiaraviglio MM; Mauricio SB; Tabernero PA; Zernotti M; Di Gregorio MF
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 119():54-58. PubMed ID: 30665177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgery or implantable hearing devices in children with congenital aural atresia: 25 years of our experience.
Jovankovičová A; Staník R; Kunzo S; Majáková L; Profant M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):975-9. PubMed ID: 25930173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term results and quality of life after vibrant soundbridge implantation (VSBs) in children and adults with aural atresia.
Gantner S; Epp A; Pollotzek M; Hempel JM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 281(1):129-139. PubMed ID: 37603051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices.
Denanto FM; Wales J; Tideholm B; Asp F
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1708-1720. PubMed ID: 35588503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraoperative Estimation of the Coupling Efficiency and Clinical Outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge Active Middle Ear Implant Using Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements.
Geiger U; Radeloff A; Hagen R; Cebulla M
Am J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 28(3):553-559. PubMed ID: 31318578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Active middle ear implants: Vibroplasty™ in children and adolescents with acquired or congenital middle ear disorders.
Clarós P; Pujol Mdel C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 133(6):612-9. PubMed ID: 23675812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP
Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Safety and effectiveness of the Vibrant Soundbridge in treating conductive and mixed hearing loss: A systematic review.
Ernst A; Todt I; Wagner J
Laryngoscope; 2016 Jun; 126(6):1451-7. PubMed ID: 26468033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Hearing rehabilitation in congenital aural atresia using the bone-anchored hearing aid: audiological and satisfaction results.
Fuchsmann C; Tringali S; Disant F; Buiret G; Dubreuil C; Froehlich P; Truy E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 130(12):1343-51. PubMed ID: 20735185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Active transcutaneous bone conduction implant: audiological results in paediatric patients with bilateral microtia associated with external auditory canal atresia.
Bravo-Torres S; Der-Mussa C; Fuentes-López E
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 28857620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
Dieudonné B; Francart T
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Merits of Bilateral Application of Bone-Conduction Devices in Children With Bilateral Conductive Hearing Loss.
den Besten CA; Vogt K; Bosman AJ; Snik AFM; Hol MKS; Agterberg MJH
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1327-1332. PubMed ID: 32032221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds.
Chordekar S; Perez R; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():59-67. PubMed ID: 29678325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
