These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30175667)

  • 1. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
    Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientists' views about communication objectives.
    Besley JC; Dudo A; Yuan S
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Aug; 27(6):708-730. PubMed ID: 28841818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
    Dudo A; Besley JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science communication on Twitter: Measuring indicators of engagement and their links to user interaction in communication scholars' Tweet content.
    Guenther L; Wilhelm C; Oschatz C; Brück J
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Oct; 32(7):860-869. PubMed ID: 37132036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting scientists' participation in public life.
    Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lithuanian scientists' behavior and views on science communication.
    Valinciute A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32126899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring scholars' public engagement goals in Canada and the United States.
    Besley JC; Newman TP; Dudo A; Tiffany LA
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Nov; 29(8):855-867. PubMed ID: 32878551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Ethical Responsibility Very Often Gets Drowned Out": A Qualitative Interview Study of Genome Scientists' and ELSI Scholars' Perspectives on the Role and Relevance of ELSI Expertise.
    Martschenko DO; Grannuci A; Cho MK
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2024 Jun; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38916600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
    Choi S; Anderson AA; Cagle S; Long M; Kelp N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287870. PubMed ID: 37531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists' public scholarship.
    Bao L; Calice MN; Brossard D; Beets B; Scheufele DA; Rose KM
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Feb; 32(2):124-142. PubMed ID: 35652301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists' attitude, norms, and willingness to engage the public.
    Ho SS; Goh TJ; Chuah ASF
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275643. PubMed ID: 36197896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.
    Yamamoto YT
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-25. PubMed ID: 22530490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A triangulated approach for understanding scientists' perceptions of public engagement with science.
    Calice MN; Bao L; Beets B; Brossard D; Scheufele DA; Feinstein NW; Heisler L; Tangen T; Handelsman J
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Apr; 32(3):389-406. PubMed ID: 36154528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responding to Richard: Celebrity and (mis)representation of science.
    Johnson DR; Ecklund EH; Di D; Matthews KRW
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jul; 27(5):535-549. PubMed ID: 29956596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication.
    Rose KM; Markowitz EM; Brossard D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(3):1274-1276. PubMed ID: 31911470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Americans' views of scientists' motivations for scientific work.
    Johnson BB; Dieckmann NF
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 31621505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "The chilling effect": Medical scientists' responses to audience feedback on their media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Nölleke D; Leonhardt BM; Hanusch F
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Jul; 32(5):546-560. PubMed ID: 36633310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbiologists' Public Engagement Views and Behaviors.
    Dudo A; Besley J; Kahlor LA; Koh H; Copple J; Yuan S
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2018; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 29904524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.