These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30175667)

  • 21. How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.
    Besley JC; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Aug; 22(6):644-59. PubMed ID: 23885050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strategic science communication in the age of politicization.
    Newman TP
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2022; 188(1):215-230. PubMed ID: 35168744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility.
    Vraga E; Myers T; Kotcher J; Beall L; Maibach E
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):170505. PubMed ID: 29515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why the views of Latin American Scientists on Citizen Science as a Tool for Pollinator Monitoring and Conservation Matter?
    Viana BF; Souza CQ; Moreira EF
    Neotrop Entomol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):604-613. PubMed ID: 32761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars' work.
    Vásárhelyi O; Zakhlebin I; Milojević S; Horvát EÁ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(39):. PubMed ID: 34544861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
    Hara N; Abbazio J; Perkins K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216789. PubMed ID: 31091264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Public participation in human genome editing research governance: what do scientists think?
    Waltz M; Flatt MA; Juengst ET; Conley JM; Cadigan RJ
    J Community Genet; 2024 Jun; 15(3):249-257. PubMed ID: 38353891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists' willingness to choose specific tactics.
    Besley JC; O'Hara K; Dudo A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224039. PubMed ID: 31639153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Science communication at scientific societies.
    Braha J
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2017 Oct; 70():85-89. PubMed ID: 28627383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mobilisation for public engagement: Benchmarking the practices of research institutes.
    Entradas M; Bauer MM
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):771-788. PubMed ID: 26951156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
    Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chinese scientists' mediated participation in public outreach: Multiple direct and personal norm-mediated predictors.
    Zhang X; Chen A; Jin J
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Mar; ():9636625241237927. PubMed ID: 38545910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Secularism in science: The role of religious affiliation in assessments of scientists' trustworthiness.
    Beauchamp AL; Rios K
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Feb; 29(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 31778102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.
    Anderson MS; Martinson BC; De Vries R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2007 Dec; 2(4):3-14. PubMed ID: 19385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach.
    Ecklund EH; James SA; Lincoln AE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36240. PubMed ID: 22590526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gap between science and media revisited: scientists as public communicators.
    Peters HP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14102-9. PubMed ID: 23940312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning the language of science: A pilot study exploring citizen scientists' identity and communication with researchers.
    Damiani R; Krieger JL; Treise D; Walsh-Childers K; Fisher CL; Bloodworth S; Brishke J; Shenkman E
    J Clin Transl Sci; 2021; 5(1):e208. PubMed ID: 35047219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attitudes and perceptions of Conacyt researchers towards public communication of science and technology.
    Sanz Merino N; Tarhuni Navarro DH
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 29893183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring Scientists' Values by Analyzing How They Frame Nature and Uncertainty.
    Vazquez M; McIlroy-Young B; Steel D; Giang A; Öberg G
    Risk Anal; 2021 Nov; 41(11):2094-2111. PubMed ID: 33598966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visible scientists in digital communication environments: An analysis of their role performance as public experts on Twitter/X during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Biermann K; Taddicken M
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 May; ():9636625241249389. PubMed ID: 38771041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.