These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30176363)
1. Evaluation of Positioning Devices for Optimization of Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery. Das D; Propst K; Wechter ME; Kho RM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):244-252.e1. PubMed ID: 30176363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Memory Foam Pad Versus the Bean Bag with Shoulder Braces in Preventing Patient Displacement during Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery. Farag S; Rosen L; Ascher-Walsh C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 28919502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing cephalad migration in robotic gynecologic surgery using egg-crate foam versus the Pink Pad Steck-Bayat KP; Henderson S; Aguirre AG; Smith RB; Mahnert NM; Gerkin RD; Mourad J J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):343-347. PubMed ID: 31256328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neurologic injury and patient displacement in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery using a beanbag and shoulder supports. Treszezamsky AD; Fenske S; Moshier EL; Ascher-Walsh CJ Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jan; 140(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 28921506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures. Klauschie J; Wechter ME; Jacob K; Zanagnolo V; Montero R; Magrina J; Kho R J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):504-7. PubMed ID: 20471916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V; J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The da Vinci Xi Robotic Four-Arm Approach for Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Grimminger PP; Hadzijusufovic E; Ruurda JP; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 66(5):407-409. PubMed ID: 29625500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety and Effectiveness of SAF-R, a Novel Patient Positioning Device for Robot-Assisted Pelvic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position. Talab SS; Elmi A; Sarma J; Barrisford GW; Tabatabaei S J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 26531773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]