BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30176542)

  • 1. Predictive value of the UICC and AJCC 8th edition tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) classification for patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Herden J; Heidenreich A; Wittekind C; Weissbach L
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 56():126-132. PubMed ID: 30176542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Stage Groups Updated in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Manual.
    Lee H; Lee M; Byun SS; Lee SE; Hong SK
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e221-e226. PubMed ID: 30472041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
    Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [TNM-Classification of localized prostate cancer : The clinical T-category does not correspond to the required demands].
    Herden J; Heidenreich A; Weißbach L
    Urologe A; 2016 Dec; 55(12):1564-1572. PubMed ID: 27830286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic value of subclassification (pT2 stage) of pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer: Confirmation of the changes introduced in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.
    Antunes HP; Parada B; Carvalho J; Eliseu M; Jarimba R; Oliveira R; Tavares-da-Silva E; Figueiredo A
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Sep; 90(3):191-194. PubMed ID: 30362685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the prognostic grouping of the seventh edition of the tumor-nodes-metastasis classification using a large-scale prospective cohort study database of prostate cancer treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy.
    Kimura T; Onozawa M; Miyazaki J; Kawai K; Nishiyama H; Hinotsu S; Akaza H
    Int J Urol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):880-8. PubMed ID: 23347189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
    Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
    Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
    BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The 4Kscore Predicts the Grade and Stage of Prostate Cancer in the Radical Prostatectomy Specimen: Results from a Multi-institutional Prospective Trial.
    Punnen S; Nahar B; Prakash NS; Sjoberg DD; Zappala SM; Parekh DJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Feb; 3(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 28720374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics.
    Graefen M; Noldus J; Pichlmeier U; Haese A; Hammerer P; Fernandez S; Conrad S; Henke R; Huland E; Huland H
    Eur Urol; 1999; 36(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10364651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting non-organ-confined prostate cancer in men diagnosed after 2000.
    Caire AA; Sun L; Lack BD; Lum K; Tang P; Stackhouse DA; Robertson CN; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Albala DM; Moul JW
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2010 Sep; 13(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 20514082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histopathological prostate cancer characteristics at radical prostatectomy after population based screening.
    Hoedemaeker RF; Rietbergen JB; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 10893598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.