These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30176825)

  • 1. Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices.
    Lanza M; Rinaldi M; Carnevale UAG; di Staso S; Sconocchia MB; Costagliola C
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 30176825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Cennamo M; Irregolare C; Romano V; Carnevale UA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 25467287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Mele L; Carnevale UA; Irregolare C; Lanza A; Femiano F; Bifani M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Apr; 39(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 26481062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different devices to measure the intraocular pressure in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.
    Kuebler AG; Wiecha C; Reznicek L; Klingenstein A; Halfter K; Priglinger S; Hintschich C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 257(9):2025-2032. PubMed ID: 31222404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.
    Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.
    Luebke J; Bryniok L; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Boehringer D; Reinhard T; Wecker T; Anton A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2517-2521. PubMed ID: 30968328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of IOP obtained in different kind of eyes with contact and no contact tonometers.
    Sbordone S; Ragucci A; Iaccarino G; Scognamiglio G; Leone A; Carnevale UAG; Lanza M
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 36760919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
    Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
    J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP.
    Yoo C; Eom YS; Kim YY
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 248(11):1611-6. PubMed ID: 20652303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
    Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
    Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.