These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30177583)

  • 1. MOABB: trustworthy algorithm benchmarking for BCIs.
    Jayaram V; Barachant A
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Dec; 15(6):066011. PubMed ID: 30177583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gumpy: a Python toolbox suitable for hybrid brain-computer interfaces.
    Tayeb Z; Waniek N; Fedjaev J; Ghaboosi N; Rychly L; Widderich C; Richter C; Braun J; Saveriano M; Cheng G; Conradt J
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Dec; 15(6):065003. PubMed ID: 30215610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wyrm: A Brain-Computer Interface Toolbox in Python.
    Venthur B; Dähne S; Höhne J; Heller H; Blankertz B
    Neuroinformatics; 2015 Oct; 13(4):471-86. PubMed ID: 26001643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ShinyLearner: A containerized benchmarking tool for machine-learning classification of tabular data.
    Piccolo SR; Lee TJ; Suh E; Hill K
    Gigascience; 2020 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32249316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pseudo-online framework for BCI evaluation: a MOABB perspective using various MI and SSVEP datasets.
    Carrara I; Papadopoulo T
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 38113535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: a 10 year update.
    Lotte F; Bougrain L; Cichocki A; Clerc M; Congedo M; Rakotomamonjy A; Yger F
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Jun; 15(3):031005. PubMed ID: 29488902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Different Classifiers in Sensory Motor Brain Computer Interfaces.
    Bashashati H; Ward RK; Birch GE; Bashashati A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129435. PubMed ID: 26090799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grouped Automatic Relevance Determination and Its Application in Channel Selection for P300 BCIs.
    Yu T; Yu Z; Gu Z; Li Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015 Nov; 23(6):1068-77. PubMed ID: 25794393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. General principles of machine learning for brain-computer interfacing.
    Iturrate I; Chavarriaga R; Millán JDR
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2020; 168():311-328. PubMed ID: 32164862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces.
    Lawhern VJ; Solon AJ; Waytowich NR; Gordon SM; Hung CP; Lance BJ
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Oct; 15(5):056013. PubMed ID: 29932424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hierarchical semi-supervised extreme learning machine method for EEG recognition.
    She Q; Hu B; Luo Z; Nguyen T; Zhang Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):147-157. PubMed ID: 30054779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BCILAB: a platform for brain-computer interface development.
    Kothe CA; Makeig S
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Oct; 10(5):056014. PubMed ID: 23985960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine-learning-based coadaptive calibration for brain-computer interfaces.
    Vidaurre C; Sannelli C; Müller KR; Blankertz B
    Neural Comput; 2011 Mar; 23(3):791-816. PubMed ID: 21162666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilinear Regularized Locality Preserving Learning on Riemannian Graph for Motor Imagery BCI.
    Xie X; Yu ZL; Gu Z; Zhang J; Cen L; Li Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Mar; 26(3):698-708. PubMed ID: 29522413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validating Deep Neural Networks for Online Decoding of Motor Imagery Movements from EEG Signals.
    Tayeb Z; Fedjaev J; Ghaboosi N; Richter C; Everding L; Qu X; Wu Y; Cheng G; Conradt J
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 30626132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. As above, so below? Towards understanding inverse models in BCI.
    Lindgren JT
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):012001. PubMed ID: 28816702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A public data hub for benchmarking common brain-computer interface algorithms.
    Zander TO; Ihme K; Gärtner M; Rötting M
    J Neural Eng; 2011 Apr; 8(2):025021. PubMed ID: 21436533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The BCI Competition 2003: progress and perspectives in detection and discrimination of EEG single trials.
    Blankertz B; Müller KR; Curio G; Vaughan TM; Schalk G; Wolpaw JR; Schlögl A; Neuper C; Pfurtscheller G; Hinterberger T; Schröder M; Birbaumer N
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jun; 51(6):1044-51. PubMed ID: 15188876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing BCI communication rates with dynamic stopping towards more practical use: an ALS study.
    Mainsah BO; Collins LM; Colwell KA; Sellers EW; Ryan DB; Caves K; Throckmorton CS
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Feb; 12(1):016013. PubMed ID: 25588137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robust artifactual independent component classification for BCI practitioners.
    Winkler I; Brandl S; Horn F; Waldburger E; Allefeld C; Tangermann M
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):035013. PubMed ID: 24836294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.