These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30179189)
1. A comparison of absorption and phase contrast for X-ray imaging of biological cells. Nave C J Synchrotron Radiat; 2018 Sep; 25(Pt 5):1490-1504. PubMed ID: 30179189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantages of intermediate X-ray energies in Zernike phase contrast X-ray microscopy. Wang Z; Gao K; Chen J; Hong Y; Ge X; Wang D; Pan Z; Zhu P; Yun W; Jacobsen C; Wu Z Biotechnol Adv; 2013; 31(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 22521962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative amplitude and phase contrast imaging in a scanning transmission X-ray microscope. Hornberger B; Feser M; Jacobsen C Ultramicroscopy; 2007 Aug; 107(8):644-55. PubMed ID: 17291688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined use of hard X-ray phase contrast imaging and X-ray fluorescence microscopy for sub-cellular metal quantification. Kosior E; Bohic S; Suhonen H; Ortega R; Devès G; Carmona A; Marchi F; Guillet JF; Cloetens P J Struct Biol; 2012 Feb; 177(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 22182730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging of cochlear tissue with a grating interferometer and hard X-rays. Richter CP; Shintani-Smith S; Fishman A; David C; Robinson I; Rau C Microsc Res Tech; 2009 Dec; 72(12):902-7. PubMed ID: 19455683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The achievable resolution for X-ray imaging of cells and other soft biological material. Nave C IUCrJ; 2020 May; 7(Pt 3):393-403. PubMed ID: 32431823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phase-contrast microscopy at high x-ray energy with a laboratory setup. Endrizzi M; Vittoria FA; Diemoz PC; Lorenzo R; Speller RD; Wagner UH; Rau C; Robinson IK; Olivo A Opt Lett; 2014 Jun; 39(11):3332-5. PubMed ID: 24876046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards tender X-rays with Zernike phase-contrast imaging of biological samples at 50 nm resolution. Vartiainen I; Warmer M; Goeries D; Herker E; Reimer R; David C; Meents A J Synchrotron Radiat; 2014 Jul; 21(Pt 4):790-4. PubMed ID: 24971976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Curved optics for x-ray phase contrast imaging by synchrotron radiation. Colonna S; D'Acapito F; Mobilio S; Onori S; Pugliani L; Romanzetti S; Rustichelli F Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):967-74. PubMed ID: 11324971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of the effects of cell model and subcellular location of gold nanoparticles on nuclear dose enhancement factors using Monte Carlo simulation. Cai Z; Pignol JP; Chattopadhyay N; Kwon YL; Lechtman E; Reilly RM Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):114101. PubMed ID: 24320476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct observation of unstained wet biological samples by scanning-electron generation X-ray microscopy. Ogura T Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2010 Jan; 391(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 19900411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of imaging geometry on noise texture in quantitative in-line X-ray phase-contrast imaging. Chou CY; Anastasio MA Opt Express; 2009 Aug; 17(17):14466-80. PubMed ID: 19687925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Status of the hard X-ray microprobe beamline ID22 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Martínez-Criado G; Tucoulou R; Cloetens P; Bleuet P; Bohic S; Cauzid J; Kieffer I; Kosior E; Labouré S; Petitgirard S; Rack A; Sans JA; Segura-Ruiz J; Suhonen H; Susini J; Villanova J J Synchrotron Radiat; 2012 Jan; 19(Pt 1):10-8. PubMed ID: 22186639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose enhancement effects to the nucleus and mitochondria from gold nanoparticles in the cytosol. McNamara AL; Kam WW; Scales N; McMahon SJ; Bennett JW; Byrne HL; Schuemann J; Paganetti H; Banati R; Kuncic Z Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):5993-6010. PubMed ID: 27435339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]