These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30179620)
1. Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance. Kornberg Z; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Cooperberg MR; Chan JM; Zhao S; Shinohara K; Carroll PR J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 30179620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer. Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer. Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy. Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Serial Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. Chu CE; Cowan JE; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Fasulo V; de la Calle CM; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 33483265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unified model involving genomics, magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density outperforms individual co-variables at predicting biopsy upgrading in patients on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. Beksac AT; Ratnani P; Dovey Z; Parekh S; Falagario U; Roshandel R; Sobotka S; Kewlani D; Davis A; Weil R; Bashorun H; Jambor I; Lewis S; Haines K; Tewari AK Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Mar; 5(3):e1492. PubMed ID: 34931468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Adverse Pathology in Men on Active Surveillance. Kornberg Z; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Chan JM; Shinohara K; Simko JP; Tenggara I; Carroll PR J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 31026214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy. Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With PI-RADS, Version 2, in Patients With Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: Which Radiologic Characteristics Can Predict Unfavorable Disease? Kim H; Pak S; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Kim M; You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Feb; 18(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 31640913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of a 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score in Serial Testing of Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer. Cedars BE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Tenggara I; Chan JM; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 30958742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PI-RADS® Category as a Predictor of Progression to Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance. Wang AZ; O’Conno LP; Yerram NK; Long L; Zeng J; Mehralivand S; Harmon SA; Lebastchi AH; Ahdoot M; Gomella PT; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Merino MJ; Shih JH; Wood BJ; Turkbey B; Pinto PA J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1229-1235. PubMed ID: 32716685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate. Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of early transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for risk stratification in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer. Voss J; Pal R; Ahmed S; Hannah M; Jaulim A; Walton T BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):863-870. PubMed ID: 29239082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI-Based Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Predicts Gleason Score Upgrade in an Active Surveillance Cohort. Washington SL; Baskin AS; Ameli N; Nguyen HG; Westphalen AC; Shinohara K; Carroll PR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):574-578. PubMed ID: 31913068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction. Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection. Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Provides Independent Information on Adverse Pathology in the Setting of Combined Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsy. Salmasi A; Said J; Shindel AW; Khoshnoodi P; Felker ER; Sisk AE; Grogan T; McCullough D; Bennett J; Bailey H; Lawrence HJ; Elashoff DA; Marks LS; Raman SS; Febbo PG; Reiter RE J Urol; 2018 Sep; 200(3):564-572. PubMed ID: 29524506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies. Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration and Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T Nonendorectal coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Context of Active Surveillance. Curci NE; Lane BR; Shankar PR; Noyes SL; Moriarity AK; Kubat A; Brede C; Montgomery JS; Auffenberg GB; Miller DC; Montie JE; George AK; Davenport MS Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():137-143. PubMed ID: 29653121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer. Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]