BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30180049)

  • 1. Sling Plication for Failed Midurethral Sling Procedures: A Case Series.
    Maheshwari D; Jones K; Solomon E; Harmanli O
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):e4-e6. PubMed ID: 30180049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sling plication for persistent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling.
    Swallow CH; Rickey LM; Harmanli O
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Apr; 34(4):957-959. PubMed ID: 36242629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Serious complications and recurrences after retropubic vs transobturator midurethral sling procedures for 2682 patients in the VIGI-MESH register.
    Armengaud C; Fauconnier A; Drioueche H; Campagne Loiseau S; De Tayrac R; Saussine C; Panel L; Cosson M; Deffieux X; Lucot JP; Pizzoferrato AC; Ferry P; Vidart A; Thubert T; Capon G; Debodinance P; Gauthier T; Koebele A; Salet-Lizee D; Hermieu JF; Game X; Ramanah R; Lamblin G; Lecornet E; Carlier-Guérin C; Chartier-Kastler E; Fritel X
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 230(4):428.e1-428.e13. PubMed ID: 38008151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term Rate of Mesh Sling Removal Following Midurethral Mesh Sling Insertion Among Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence.
    Gurol-Urganci I; Geary RS; Mamza JB; Duckett J; El-Hamamsy D; Dolan L; Tincello DG; van der Meulen J
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(16):1659-1669. PubMed ID: 30357298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reoperation for Urinary Incontinence After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures.
    Trabuco EC; Carranza D; El Nashar SA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Elliott DS; Linder BJ; Occhino J; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 31306327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.
    Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Murray C; Schierlitz L; Dykes N; Zilberlicht A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):593.e1-593.e8. PubMed ID: 33316277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midurethral sling shortening for persistent stress urinary incontinence.
    Miranne JM; Hampton BS; Sung VW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jun; 23(6):805-7. PubMed ID: 22143449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incontinence rates after midurethral sling revision for vaginal exposure or pain.
    Jambusaria LH; Heft J; Reynolds WS; Dmochowski R; Biller DH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):764.e1-764.e5. PubMed ID: 27448731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
    Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.
    Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Carranza Leon DA; Trabuco EC
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 26811112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of retropubic synthetic mid-urethral slings to fascia pubovaginal slings following failed sling surgery.
    Aberger M; Gomelsky A; Padmanabhan P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Sep; 35(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 26175333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.
    Madsen AM; El-Nashar SA; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB; Trabuco EC
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Mar; 25(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 24043128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Midurethral Sling Surgery on Sexual Activity and Function in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence.
    Mengerink BB; Van Leijsen SA; Vierhout ME; Inthout J; Mol BW; Milani AL; Roovers JP; Van Eijndhoven HW; Van Der Vaart CH; Van Gestel I; Hartog FE; Heesakkers JF; Kluivers KB
    J Sex Med; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1498-507. PubMed ID: 27641921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indications and risk factors for midurethral sling revision.
    Unger CA; Rizzo AE; Ridgeway B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 26134541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthetic Midurethral Slings: Roles, Outcomes, and Complications.
    Linder BJ; Elliott DS
    Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 30466699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
    Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent midurethral sling excision or lysis at the time of repeat sling for treatment of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence.
    Steele SE; Hill AJ; Unger CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Feb; 29(2):285-290. PubMed ID: 28580496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical Pain After Transobturator and Retropubic Midurethral Sling Placement.
    Thomas TN; Siff LN; Jelovsek JE; Barber M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 28594776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reoperations for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Finnish National Register Study.
    Kurkijärvi K; Aaltonen R; Gissler M; Mäkinen J
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):754-759. PubMed ID: 28753896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.