These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30180670)

  • 1. Auditory distraction by speech: Comparison of fluctuating and steady speech-like masking sounds.
    Renz T; Leistner P; Liebl A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):EL83. PubMed ID: 30180670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory distraction by speech: Sound masking with speech-shaped stationary noise outperforms -5 dB per octave shaped noise.
    Renz T; Leistner P; Liebl A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):EL212. PubMed ID: 29604706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective and objective rating of spectrally different pseudorandom noises--implications for speech masking design.
    Hongisto V; Oliva D; Rekola L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1344-55. PubMed ID: 25786947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Office noise: Can headphones and masking sound attenuate distraction by background speech?
    Jahncke H; Björkeholm P; Marsh JE; Odelius J; Sörqvist P
    Work; 2016 Nov; 55(3):505-513. PubMed ID: 27768004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrelevant speech effect under stationary and adaptive masking conditions.
    Park M; Kohlrausch A; van Leest A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):1970-81. PubMed ID: 23967930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.
    Grose JH; Griz S; Pacífico FA; Advíncula KP; Menezes DC
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 25630394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech privacy and annoyance considerations in the acoustic environment of passenger cars of high-speed trains.
    Jeon JY; Hong JY; Jang HS; Kim JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3976-84. PubMed ID: 26723351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory detection of non-speech and speech stimuli in noise: Native speech advantage.
    Huo S; Tao S; Wang W; Li M; Dong Q; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL161. PubMed ID: 27250202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da.
    Martin BA; Sigal A; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1585-99. PubMed ID: 9069627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.