These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30181100)

  • 1. How the ESPU grades clinical abstracts.
    Kaefer M; Beckers G; Gobet R; El-Ghoneimi A; Fossum M;
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Oct; 14(5):451-452. PubMed ID: 30181100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abstracts presented at the European Society for Pediatric Urology (ESPU) meetings (2003-2010): characteristics and outcome.
    Castagnetti M; Subramaniam R; El-Ghoneimi A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Apr; 10(2):355-60. PubMed ID: 24172797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of duplicate presentations accepted at two top international pediatric urology meetings.
    Kim S; Braga LH; Pemberton J; Demaria J; Lorenzo AJ
    J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 21439908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving participation and interrater agreement in scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association abstracts. How well have we succeeded?
    Kemper KJ; McCarthy PL; Cicchetti DV
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1996 Apr; 150(4):380-3. PubMed ID: 8634732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting quality of abstracts presented at the European Association of Urology meeting: a critical assessment.
    De Sio M; Yakoubi R; De Nunzio C; Damiano R; Balsamo R; Di Palma C; Cantiello F; Azzarito G; Mirone V; Tubaro A; Autorino R
    J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1883-6. PubMed ID: 22999688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reviewer agreement in scoring 419 abstracts for scientific orthopedics meetings.
    Poolman RW; Keijser LC; de Waal Malefijt MC; Blankevoort L; Farrokhyar F; Bhandari M;
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Apr; 78(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 17464619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of a structured method of selecting abstracts for a plastic surgical scientific meeting.
    van der Steen LP; Hage JJ; Kon M; Monstrey SJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jan; 113(1):353-9. PubMed ID: 14707659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ESPU Editorial.
    El-Ghoneimi A; Stein R; Herndon CD
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):191. PubMed ID: 27499281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of abstracts submitted for the annual meeting of the German Neurosurgical Society 1999--unravelling a mystery.
    Uhl E; Steiger HJ; Barth C; Reulen HJ
    Zentralbl Neurochir; 1999; 60(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 10674337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abstract scoring for the annual SMR program: significance of reviewer score normalization.
    Glover GH; Henkelman RM
    Magn Reson Med; 1994 Oct; 32(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 7997106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publication rate of abstracts presented at European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society Annual Meetings, 2006 to 2008.
    Kleine-Konig MT; Schulte TL; Gosheger G; Rödl R; Schiedel FM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2014 Sep; 34(6):e33-8. PubMed ID: 24590329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis.
    Autorino R; Quarto G; Di Lorenzo G; De Sio M; Damiano R
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):833-40; discussion 840. PubMed ID: 17084516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferior reliability of VAS scoring compared with International Society of the Knee reporting system for abstract assessment.
    Rahbek O; Jensen SL; Lind M; Penny JØ; Kallemose T; Jakobsen T; Troelsen A
    Dan Med J; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 28385168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of a structured method of selecting abstracts for a plastic surgical scientific meeting.
    van der Steen LP; Hage JJ; Kon M; Mazzola R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jun; 111(7):2215-22. PubMed ID: 12794462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interrupted time series analysis showed suboptimal improvement in reporting quality of trial abstract.
    Chhapola V; Tiwari S; Brar R; Kanwal SK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Mar; 71():11-7. PubMed ID: 26524495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conversion rates of abstracts presented at the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Annual Scientific Meeting into full-text journal articles.
    Yoon PD; Chalasani V; Woo HH
    BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22300438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of the reviewer.
    Ector H; Aubert A; Stroobandt R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1215-7. PubMed ID: 7659574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research ethics committee approval as reported for abstracts submitted to the annual Euroanaesthesia meeting.
    McConnell P; Kaufman N; De Hert S; Samama CM; Molnar Z; Einav S
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):824-830. PubMed ID: 28841636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific progress and dissemination of research results: abstracts versus peer-reviewed publications.
    Buckwalter JA; Wright TM
    J Orthop Res; 1998 Nov; 16(6):643-4. PubMed ID: 9877385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication.
    Hoag CC; Elterman DS; Macneily AE
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2624-9; discussion 2629. PubMed ID: 17085176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.