BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30181267)

  • 1. Infrastructure to enable deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage in the United States.
    Edwards RWJ; Celia MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(38):E8815-E8824. PubMed ID: 30181267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategic Carbon Dioxide Infrastructure to Achieve a Low-Carbon Power Sector in the Midwestern and South-Central United States.
    Tao Y; Edwards RWJ; Mauzerall DL; Celia MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(22):15013-15024. PubMed ID: 34714051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States.
    Sanchez DL; Johnson N; McCoy ST; Turner PA; Mach KJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(19):4875-4880. PubMed ID: 29686063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Assessment of Emission Reduction Potential of CO
    Wei N; Liu SN; Wei F; Li XC
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2023 Dec; 44(12):6621-6629. PubMed ID: 38098389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
    Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CO
    Roefs P; Moretti M; Welkenhuysen K; Piessens K; Compernolle T
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 239():167-177. PubMed ID: 30901695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economics of carbon dioxide capture and utilization-a supply and demand perspective.
    Naims H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(22):22226-22241. PubMed ID: 27189450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An interval chance-constrained programming-based optimization model for carbon capture, utilization, and storage system planning.
    Zhai M; Jia H; Yin D
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 772():145560. PubMed ID: 33770860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mesoscale carbon sequestration site screening and CCS infrastructure analysis.
    Keating GN; Middleton RS; Stauffer PH; Viswanathan HS; Letellier BC; Pasqualini D; Pawar RJ; Wolfsberg AV
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 20698546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential matching of carbon capture storage and utilization (CCSU) as enhanced oil recovery in perspective to Indian oil refineries.
    Dalei NN; Joshi J
    Clean Technol Environ Policy; 2022; 24(9):2701-2717. PubMed ID: 35846986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites.
    Dai Z; Viswanathan H; Middleton R; Pan F; Ampomah W; Yang C; Jia W; Xiao T; Lee SY; McPherson B; Balch R; Grigg R; White M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7546-54. PubMed ID: 27362472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Ecological Constraints on a CO
    Shih JS; Chen B; Thompson AL; Krupnick A; Livingston D; Pratt R; Pawar R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Oct; 57(43):16255-16264. PubMed ID: 37856836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO
    Edmonds J; Nichols C; Adamantiades M; Bistline J; Huster J; Iyer G; Johnson N; Patel P; Showalter S; Victor N; Waldhoff S; Wise M; Wood F
    Energy Policy; 2020; 146():. PubMed ID: 35444362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of Direct Air Capture Integrated with Wind Energy and Enhanced Oil Recovery.
    Datta A; Krishnamoorti R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 57(5):2084-2092. PubMed ID: 36692891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilization from ammonia process in Mexico.
    Morales Mora MA; Vergara CP; Leiva MA; Martínez Delgadillo SA; Rosa-Domínguez ER
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):998-1008. PubMed ID: 27692511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advancing "Carbon Peak" and "Carbon Neutrality" in China: A Comprehensive Review of Current Global Research on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Technology and Its Implications.
    Li H
    ACS Omega; 2023 Nov; 8(45):42086-42101. PubMed ID: 38024721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of Policy Framework for the Development of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage in China.
    Song D; Jiang T; Rao C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CO2 deserts: implications of existing CO2 supply limitations for carbon management.
    Middleton RS; Clarens AF; Liu X; Bielicki JM; Levine JS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11713-20. PubMed ID: 25137398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.