These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30181565)

  • 1. Integrating tertiary Gleason pattern 5 into the ISUP grading system improves prediction of biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients.
    Kato M; Hirakawa A; Kobayashi Y; Yamamoto A; Ishida R; Kamihira O; Kimura T; Majima T; Ishida S; Funahashi Y; Sassa N; Fujita T; Matsukawa Y; Yamamoto T; Hattori R; Gotoh M; Tsuzuki T
    Mod Pathol; 2019 Jan; 32(1):122-127. PubMed ID: 30181565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
    Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.
    Pierorazio PM; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 23464824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in Japanese men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Miyake H; Muramaki M; Furukawa J; Tanaka H; Inoue TA; Fujisawa M
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1511-6. PubMed ID: 22658882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
    Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
    J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: the role of prognostic grade group and index tumor nodule.
    Vau N; Henriques V; Cheng L; Blanca A; Fonseca J; Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Lopez-Beltran A
    Hum Pathol; 2019 Nov; 93():6-15. PubMed ID: 31442520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic influence of the third Gleason grade in prostatectomy specimens.
    Cedeño Díaz OM; Fernández Aceñero MJ; Alvarez Fernández E
    Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 21292510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gleason Pattern 5 is a Possible Pathologic Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.
    Ikeda M; Amano N; Sakata Y; Honda T; Tachibana T; Hirano S; Yamashita H; Ishii J; Irie A
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 20(3):783-788. PubMed ID: 30909685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model.
    Taguchi S; Uemura Y; Fujimura T; Morikawa T; Naito A; Kawai T; Suzuki M; Kume H; Fukuhara H
    BMC Cancer; 2020 May; 20(1):371. PubMed ID: 32357849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Downgrading from Biopsy Gleason 7 to Prostatectomy Gleason 6 on Biochemical Recurrence and Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality.
    Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
    J Urol; 2017 Apr; 197(4):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 27847296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.
    Wissing M; Brimo F; Chevalier S; Scarlata E; McKercher G; O'Flaherty A; Aprikian S; Thibodeau V; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Aprikian A
    BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 30113732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating Tertiary Gleason 5 Patterns into Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
    Sauter G; Clauditz T; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Büscheck F; Krech T; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Harms L; Lawrenz L; Möller-Koop C; Simon R; Jacobsen F; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Weidemann S; Haese A; Steuber T; Salomon G; Matiu M; Vettorazzi E; Michl U; Budäus L; Tilki D; Thederan I; Pehrke D; Beyer B; Fraune C; Göbel C; Heinrich M; Juhnke M; Möller K; Bawahab AAA; Uhlig R; Huland H; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Schlomm T
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):674-683. PubMed ID: 28117112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Gleason pattern 5 including tertiary pattern 5 on outcomes of salvage treatment for biochemical recurrence in pT2-3N0M0 prostate cancer.
    Taguchi S; Shiraishi K; Fukuhara H; Nakagawa K; Morikawa T; Naito A; Kakutani S; Takeshima Y; Miyazaki H; Nakagawa T; Fujimura T; Kume H; Homma Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 21(5):975-980. PubMed ID: 27098807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A tertiary Gleason pattern in the prostatectomy specimen and its association with adverse outcome after radical prostatectomy.
    Adam M; Hannah A; Budäus L; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Haese A; Fisch M; Wittmer C; Steurer S; Minner S; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Sauter G; Schlomm T; Isbarn H
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 24518778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significance of Gleason Score 7 With Tertiary Pattern 5 at Radical Prostatectomy.
    Borhan W; Epstein JI
    Urology; 2017 Feb; 100():175-179. PubMed ID: 27810358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.