These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30182078)
21. Miniature ureteroscope distal tip designs for potential use in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy. Wilson C; Kennedy JD; Irby P; Fried N J Biomed Opt; 2018 Jul; 23(7):1-9. PubMed ID: 29981222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Novel Flexible Ureteroscope with Omnidirectional Bending Tip Using Joystick-Type Control Unit (URF-Y0016): Initial Validation Study in Bench Models. Tambo M; Inoue T; Miura H; Matsuzaki J; Nutahara K; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Fukuhara H; Fujisawa M; Matsuda T J Endourol; 2020 Jun; 34(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 31984760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes. Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes. Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly. Hu H; Lu Y; He D; Cui L; Zhang J; Zhao Z; Qin B; Wang Y; Lin F; Wang S Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 26705003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of optics and performance of single channel and a novel dual-channel fiberoptic ureteroscope. Lusch A; Okhunov Z; del Junco M; Yoon R; Khanipour R; Menhadji A; Landman J Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):268-72. PubMed ID: 25530400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Durability of current generation flexible ureteroscopes: the experience from a high-volume centre. Vaddi CM; Ramakrishna P; Ganesan S; Swamy S; Anandan H; Babu M Cent European J Urol; 2022; 75(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 35937666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopy: an update. Rassweiler J; Fiedler M; Charalampogiannis N; Kabakci AS; Saglam R; Klein JT Urolithiasis; 2018 Feb; 46(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 29170856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of laser fiber passage in ureteroscopic maximum deflection and their influence on deflection and irrigation: Do we really need the ball tip concept? Baghdadi M; Emiliani E; Talso M; Servián P; Barreiro A; Orosa A; Proietti S; Traxer O World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):313-318. PubMed ID: 27300338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Novel Flexible Ureteroscopy with Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure: An Initial Experience of 93 Cases. Deng X; Song L; Xie D; Fan D; Zhu L; Yao L; Wang X; Liu S; Zhang Y; Liao X; Liu S; Peng Z; Hu M; Zhu X; Huang J; Liu T; Du C; Guo S; Yang Z; Peng G; Ye Z J Endourol; 2016 Oct; 30(10):1067-1072. PubMed ID: 27558001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The "no-touch" technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones. Geavlete B; Cozma C; Geavlete P J Med Life; 2021; 14(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 34621370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing the Efficacy of a Multimodular Flexible Ureteroscope With Its Conventional Counterpart in the Management of Renal Stones. Ding J; Xu D; Cao Q; Huang T; Zhu Y; Huang K; Chen Y; Liang C; Qi J; Huang Y Urology; 2015 Aug; 86(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 26169008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. RETROGRADE INTRARENAL LITHOTRIPSY USING DISPOSABLE FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPE. Mohammad M; Jassim F; Tiryag A Georgian Med News; 2024 Mar; (348):44-46. PubMed ID: 38807389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Flexible ureterorenoscopy: prospective analysis of the Guy's experience. Dasgupta P; Cynk MS; Bultitude MF; Tiptaft RC; Glass JM Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2004 Sep; 86(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 15333176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscope Performance between Reusable and Single-Use Models. Bragaru M; Multescu R; Geavlete P; Popescu R; Geavlete B J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fiberoptic versus Digital: A Comparison of Durability and Cost Effectiveness of the Two Flexible Ureteroscopes. Temiz MZ; Colakerol A; Ertas K; Tuken M; Yuruk E Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 30463076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can We Provide Low Intrarenal Pressures with Good Irrigation Flow by Decreasing the Size of Ureteral Access Sheaths? Sener TE; Cloutier J; Villa L; Marson F; Butticè S; Doizi S; Traxer O J Endourol; 2016 Jan; 30(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 26381037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective comparative study between the effect of CIDEX Al Qahtani SH; Abdelhamied MH; AlMuhrij AH; Al Rawashada MY; Al Askar AM; Abdelhamid AM; Fath El-Bab TK; Galal EM; Eladawy MS World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):775-781. PubMed ID: 31087123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gap between UAS and ureteroscope predicts renal stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy with the fragmentation technique. Komeya M; Odaka H; Watanabe T; Kiuchi H; Ogawa T; Yao M; Matsuzaki J World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2733-2739. PubMed ID: 32986134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Flexible and rigid ureteroscopy in outpatient surgery. Oitchayomi A; Doerfler A; Le Gal S; Chawhan C; Tillou X BMC Urol; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26822017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]