268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30182168)
1. A systems approach to assess climate change mitigation options in landscapes of the United States forest sector.
Dugan AJ; Birdsey R; Mascorro VS; Magnan M; Smyth CE; Olguin M; Kurz WA
Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 30182168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Opportunities for forest sector emissions reductions: a state-level analysis.
Dugan AJ; Lichstein JW; Steele A; Metsaranta JM; Bick S; Hollinger DY
Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02327. PubMed ID: 33742488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Climate change mitigation in Canada's forest sector: a spatially explicit case study for two regions.
Smyth CE; Smiley BP; Magnan M; Birdsey R; Dugan AJ; Olguin M; Mascorro VS; Kurz WA
Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 30187146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Climate change mitigation in British Columbia's forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts.
Smyth CE; Xu Z; Lemprière TC; Kurz WA
Carbon Balance Manag; 2020 Oct; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 33001303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Under What Circumstances Do Wood Products from Native Forests Benefit Climate Change Mitigation?
Keith H; Lindenmayer D; Macintosh A; Mackey B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139640. PubMed ID: 26436916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Climate change mitigation strategies in the forest sector: biophysical impacts and economic implications in British Columbia, Canada.
Xu Z; Smyth CE; Lemprière TC; Rampley GJ; Kurz WA
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang; 2018; 23(2):257-290. PubMed ID: 30093831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States.
McKinley DC; Ryan MG; Birdsey RA; Giardina CP; Harmon ME; Heath LS; Houghton RA; Jackson RB; Morrison JF; Murray BC; Patakl DE; Skog KE
Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1902-24. PubMed ID: 21939033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.
McKechnie J; Colombo S; Chen J; Mabee W; MacLean HL
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):789-95. PubMed ID: 21142063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling forest carbon stock changes as affected by harvest and natural disturbances. II. EU-level analysis.
Pilli R; Grassi G; Kurz WA; Moris JV; Viñas RA
Carbon Balance Manag; 2016 Dec; 11(1):20. PubMed ID: 27635153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies.
Daigneault A; Baker JS; Guo J; Lauri P; Favero A; Forsell N; Johnston C; Ohrel SB; Sohngen B
Glob Environ Change; 2022 Aug; 76():1-13. PubMed ID: 38024226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Life cycle carbon emissions of different land conversion and woody biomass utilization scenarios in Indonesia.
Aryapratama R; Pauliuk S
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 805():150226. PubMed ID: 34536883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contribution of forest wood products to negative emissions: historical comparative analysis from 1960 to 2015 in Norway, Sweden and Finland.
Iordan CM; Hu X; Arvesen A; Kauppi P; Cherubini F
Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):12. PubMed ID: 30182155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Climate Change Mitigation Challenge for Wood Utilization-The Case of Finland.
Soimakallio S; Saikku L; Valsta L; Pingoud K
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(10):5127-34. PubMed ID: 27074531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions.
Howard C; Dymond CC; Griess VC; Tolkien-Spurr D; van Kooten GC
Carbon Balance Manag; 2021 Mar; 16(1):9. PubMed ID: 33786694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling the CO
Knauf M; Köhl M; Mues V; Olschofsky K; Frühwald A
Carbon Balance Manag; 2015 Dec; 10():13. PubMed ID: 26097501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating New Zealand's harvested wood products carbon stocks and stock changes.
Wakelin SJ; Searles N; Lawrence D; Paul TSH
Carbon Balance Manag; 2020 May; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 32440735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EU mitigation potential of harvested wood products.
Pilli R; Fiorese G; Grassi G
Carbon Balance Manag; 2015 Dec; 10(1):6. PubMed ID: 26457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carbon costs and benefits of France's biomass energy production targets.
Valade A; Luyssaert S; Vallet P; Njakou Djomo S; Jesus Van Der Kellen I; Bellassen V
Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Dec; 13(1):26. PubMed ID: 30547241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests.
Law BE; Hudiburg TW; Berner LT; Kent JJ; Buotte PC; Harmon ME
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):3663-3668. PubMed ID: 29555758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inward- versus outward-focused bioeconomy strategies for British Columbia's forest products industry: a harvested wood products carbon storage and emission perspective.
Xie SH; Kurz WA; McFarlane PN
Carbon Balance Manag; 2021 Sep; 16(1):30. PubMed ID: 34562161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
