These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30182168)

  • 1. A systems approach to assess climate change mitigation options in landscapes of the United States forest sector.
    Dugan AJ; Birdsey R; Mascorro VS; Magnan M; Smyth CE; Olguin M; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 30182168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opportunities for forest sector emissions reductions: a state-level analysis.
    Dugan AJ; Lichstein JW; Steele A; Metsaranta JM; Bick S; Hollinger DY
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02327. PubMed ID: 33742488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Climate change mitigation in Canada's forest sector: a spatially explicit case study for two regions.
    Smyth CE; Smiley BP; Magnan M; Birdsey R; Dugan AJ; Olguin M; Mascorro VS; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 30187146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Climate change mitigation in British Columbia's forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts.
    Smyth CE; Xu Z; Lemprière TC; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2020 Oct; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 33001303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Under What Circumstances Do Wood Products from Native Forests Benefit Climate Change Mitigation?
    Keith H; Lindenmayer D; Macintosh A; Mackey B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139640. PubMed ID: 26436916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Climate change mitigation strategies in the forest sector: biophysical impacts and economic implications in British Columbia, Canada.
    Xu Z; Smyth CE; Lemprière TC; Rampley GJ; Kurz WA
    Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang; 2018; 23(2):257-290. PubMed ID: 30093831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States.
    McKinley DC; Ryan MG; Birdsey RA; Giardina CP; Harmon ME; Heath LS; Houghton RA; Jackson RB; Morrison JF; Murray BC; Patakl DE; Skog KE
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1902-24. PubMed ID: 21939033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the impact of key factors on the carbon mitigation potential of managed temperate forests.
    Gregor K; Krause A; Reyer CPO; Knoke T; Meyer BF; Suvanto S; Rammig A
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2024 Mar; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 38430356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.
    McKechnie J; Colombo S; Chen J; Mabee W; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):789-95. PubMed ID: 21142063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling forest carbon stock changes as affected by harvest and natural disturbances. II. EU-level analysis.
    Pilli R; Grassi G; Kurz WA; Moris JV; Viñas RA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2016 Dec; 11(1):20. PubMed ID: 27635153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies.
    Daigneault A; Baker JS; Guo J; Lauri P; Favero A; Forsell N; Johnston C; Ohrel SB; Sohngen B
    Glob Environ Change; 2022 Aug; 76():1-13. PubMed ID: 38024226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Life cycle carbon emissions of different land conversion and woody biomass utilization scenarios in Indonesia.
    Aryapratama R; Pauliuk S
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 805():150226. PubMed ID: 34536883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of forest wood products to negative emissions: historical comparative analysis from 1960 to 2015 in Norway, Sweden and Finland.
    Iordan CM; Hu X; Arvesen A; Kauppi P; Cherubini F
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):12. PubMed ID: 30182155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Climate Change Mitigation Challenge for Wood Utilization-The Case of Finland.
    Soimakallio S; Saikku L; Valsta L; Pingoud K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(10):5127-34. PubMed ID: 27074531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions.
    Howard C; Dymond CC; Griess VC; Tolkien-Spurr D; van Kooten GC
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2021 Mar; 16(1):9. PubMed ID: 33786694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the CO
    Knauf M; Köhl M; Mues V; Olschofsky K; Frühwald A
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2015 Dec; 10():13. PubMed ID: 26097501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating New Zealand's harvested wood products carbon stocks and stock changes.
    Wakelin SJ; Searles N; Lawrence D; Paul TSH
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2020 May; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 32440735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EU mitigation potential of harvested wood products.
    Pilli R; Fiorese G; Grassi G
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2015 Dec; 10(1):6. PubMed ID: 26457115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carbon costs and benefits of France's biomass energy production targets.
    Valade A; Luyssaert S; Vallet P; Njakou Djomo S; Jesus Van Der Kellen I; Bellassen V
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Dec; 13(1):26. PubMed ID: 30547241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests.
    Law BE; Hudiburg TW; Berner LT; Kent JJ; Buotte PC; Harmon ME
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):3663-3668. PubMed ID: 29555758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.