141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30182744)
1. Comparison of manual and dose reduction modes of a MORITA R100 CBCT.
Rottke D; Dreger J; Sawada K; Honda K; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180009. PubMed ID: 30182744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region.
Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Ludlow J; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):128-138. PubMed ID: 33811787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners].
Okano T; Matsuo A; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22449896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices.
Rottke D; Patzelt S; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120417. PubMed ID: 23584925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from cone-beam computed tomography.
Rottke D; Andersson J; Ejima KI; Sawada K; Schulze D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun; 175(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 27664428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A manufacturer's role in reducing the dose of cone beam computed tomography examinations: effect of beam filtration.
Ludlow JB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 21239575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TLD measurements and Monte Carlo calculations of head and neck organ and effective doses for cone beam computed tomography using 3D Accuitomo 170.
Ernst M; Manser P; Dula K; Volken W; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20170047. PubMed ID: 28749697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT.
Jeong DK; Lee SC; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Jun; 42(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22783473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 23825221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effective dose of cone beam CT and multislice CT for temporomandibular joint examinations at optimized exposure levels.
Kadesjö N; Benchimol D; Falahat B; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150041. PubMed ID: 26119344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system.
Cheng HC; Wu VW; Liu ES; Kwong DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):291-300. PubMed ID: 20932676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
