74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30184045)
1. Deconvoluting essential gene signatures for cancer growth from genomic expression in compound-treated cells.
Jung J; Kang Y; Paik H; Kwon M; Yu H; Lee D
Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 35(7):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 30184045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterizing therapeutic signatures of transcription factors in cancer by incorporating profiles in compound treated cells.
Jung J
Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(7):1008-1014. PubMed ID: 32886093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling gene-wise dependencies improves the identification of drug response biomarkers in cancer studies.
Nikolova O; Moser R; Kemp C; Gönen M; Margolin AA
Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(9):1362-1369. PubMed ID: 28082455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer driver gene discovery through an integrative genomics approach in a non-parametric Bayesian framework.
Yang H; Wei Q; Zhong X; Yang H; Li B
Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 27797769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian approach to accurate and robust signature detection on LINCS L1000 data.
Qiu Y; Lu T; Lim H; Xie L
Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 36(9):2787-2795. PubMed ID: 32003771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens.
Li W; Xu H; Xiao T; Cong L; Love MI; Zhang F; Irizarry RA; Liu JS; Brown M; Liu XS
Genome Biol; 2014; 15(12):554. PubMed ID: 25476604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CNet: a multi-omics approach to detecting clinically associated, combinatory genomic signatures.
Jia P; Pei G; Zhao Z
Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(24):5207-5215. PubMed ID: 31141125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single cell genomics reveals activation signatures of endogenous SCAR's networks in aneuploid human embryos and clinically intractable malignant tumors.
Glinsky GV
Cancer Lett; 2016 Oct; 381(1):176-93. PubMed ID: 27497790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Network-based integration of multi-omics data for prioritizing cancer genes.
Dimitrakopoulos C; Hindupur SK; Häfliger L; Behr J; Montazeri H; Hall MN; Beerenwinkel N
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(14):2441-2448. PubMed ID: 29547932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mutational signature learning with supervised negative binomial non-negative matrix factorization.
Lyu X; Garret J; Rätsch G; Lehmann KV
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i154-i160. PubMed ID: 32657388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SigMat: a classification scheme for gene signature matching.
Xiao J; Blatti C; Sinha S
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i547-i554. PubMed ID: 29950002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Network analysis of gene essentiality in functional genomics experiments.
Jiang P; Wang H; Li W; Zang C; Li B; Wong YJ; Meyer C; Liu JS; Aster JC; Liu XS
Genome Biol; 2015 Oct; 16():239. PubMed ID: 26518695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HOGMMNC: a higher order graph matching with multiple network constraints model for gene-drug regulatory modules identification.
Chen J; Peng H; Han G; Cai H; Cai J
Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 35(4):602-610. PubMed ID: 30052773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A space and time-efficient index for the compacted colored de Bruijn graph.
Almodaresi F; Sarkar H; Srivastava A; Patro R
Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i169-i177. PubMed ID: 29949982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unraveling the role of low-frequency mutated genes in breast cancer.
Lusito E; Felice B; D'Ario G; Ogier A; Montani F; Di Fiore PP; Bianchi F
Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 29961866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ScreenBEAM: a novel meta-analysis algorithm for functional genomics screens via Bayesian hierarchical modeling.
Yu J; Silva J; Califano A
Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 32(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 26415723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chromatin accessibility prediction via a hybrid deep convolutional neural network.
Liu Q; Xia F; Yin Q; Jiang R
Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 34(5):732-738. PubMed ID: 29069282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integration of somatic mutation, expression and functional data reveals potential driver genes predictive of breast cancer survival.
Suo C; Hrydziuszko O; Lee D; Pramana S; Saputra D; Joshi H; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2607-13. PubMed ID: 25810432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unsupervised correction of gene-independent cell responses to CRISPR-Cas9 targeting.
Iorio F; Behan FM; Gonçalves E; Bhosle SG; Chen E; Shepherd R; Beaver C; Ansari R; Pooley R; Wilkinson P; Harper S; Butler AP; Stronach EA; Saez-Rodriguez J; Yusa K; Garnett MJ
BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):604. PubMed ID: 30103702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Figmop: a profile HMM to identify genes and bypass troublesome gene models in draft genomes.
Curran DM; Gilleard JS; Wasmuth JD
Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 30(22):3266-7. PubMed ID: 25115706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
