983 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30187156)
1. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Chen H; Ma B; Gao P; Wang H; Song Y; Tong L; Li P; Wang Z
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 15(1):229. PubMed ID: 29282141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhang X; Wu Q; Hu T; Gu C; Bi L; Wang Z
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Feb; 28(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 29232537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS;
Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of outcomes following intersphincteric resection vs low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review.
Ursi P; Santoro A; Gemini A; Arezzo A; Pironi D; Renzi C; Cirocchi R; Di Matteo FM; Maturo A; D'Andrea V; Sagar J
G Chir; 2018; 39(3):123-142. PubMed ID: 29923482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.
Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Orsenigo E; Di Palo S; Vignali A; Staudacher C
Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1():S117-20. PubMed ID: 18023571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approach and multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery.
Kuo LJ; Hung CS; Wang W; Tam KW; Lee HC; Liang HH; Chang YJ; Huang MT; Wei PL
J Surg Res; 2013 Aug; 183(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 23465434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intersphincteric resection and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in the Indian setting.
Pai VD; De Souza A; Patil P; Engineer R; Arya S; Saklani A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 34(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25583650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?
Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
