These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1008 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30187156)

  • 1. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
    Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Ma B; Gao P; Wang H; Song Y; Tong L; Li P; Wang Z
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 15(1):229. PubMed ID: 29282141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
    Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang X; Wu Q; Hu T; Gu C; Bi L; Wang Z
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Feb; 28(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 29232537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS;
    Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of outcomes following intersphincteric resection vs low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Ursi P; Santoro A; Gemini A; Arezzo A; Pironi D; Renzi C; Cirocchi R; Di Matteo FM; Maturo A; D'Andrea V; Sagar J
    G Chir; 2018; 39(3):123-142. PubMed ID: 29923482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
    Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
    Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
    Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes.
    Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
    Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
    Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Orsenigo E; Di Palo S; Vignali A; Staudacher C
    Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 1():S117-20. PubMed ID: 18023571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approach and multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery.
    Kuo LJ; Hung CS; Wang W; Tam KW; Lee HC; Liang HH; Chang YJ; Huang MT; Wei PL
    J Surg Res; 2013 Aug; 183(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 23465434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intersphincteric resection and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in the Indian setting.
    Pai VD; De Souza A; Patil P; Engineer R; Arya S; Saklani A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 34(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25583650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?
    Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
    Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.